[port-srv-reg] FW: Merging Stuart's registry with port-numbers

Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org> Mon, 11 April 2011 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <michelle.cotton@icann.org>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6468FE06A6 for <port-srv-reg@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.589, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Dsw7u5gSYj3 for <port-srv-reg@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org (expfe100-1.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.236]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69CAE06A3 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.236]) with mapi; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:19:44 -0700
From: Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org>
To: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:19:41 -0700
Thread-Topic: Merging Stuart's registry with port-numbers
Thread-Index: Acv4goXpuoBDDSPPS/OlHhmC30vJxwAA0PiM
Message-ID: <C9C8B06D.2ECE0%michelle.cotton@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <4DA35CCC.9050304@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [port-srv-reg] FW: Merging Stuart's registry with port-numbers
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:25:12 -0000

All:

We are in the process of officially combining the ports/service name
registries.

Stuart's registry (http://www.dns-sd.org/ServiceTypes.html) contains
these two entries:

panoply         Panoply multimedia composite transfer protocol
                Natarajan Balasundara <rajan at ipanoramii.com>
                Primary Transport Protocol: Proprietary
                Defined TXT keys: None

parabay-p2p     Parabay P2P protocol
                Vishnu Varadaraj <vishnuv at parabay.com>
                Primary Transport Protocol: Proprietary
                Defined TXT keys: None

There is a problem with the "Proprietary" transport protocol. The new
port-numbers registry accepts only UDP, TCP, SCTP, or DCCP as transport
protocol (according to draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-10 section 8.1.1).

How do we deal with this one?

Thanks,

--Michelle