IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [port-srv-reg] "xmp" service type and the unified IANA Service Name and Port Number Registry

Bobby Krupczak <rdk@krupczak.org> Wed, 24 August 2011 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rdk@krupczak.org>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72D521F8783 for <port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.766
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.766 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r6GW4PZmywC9 for <port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uncasville.krupczak.org (uncasville.krupczak.org [192.24.251.116]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F66721F8742 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by uncasville.krupczak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443F22404C4; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:32:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at krupczak.org
Received: from uncasville.krupczak.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (uncasville.krupczak.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eBXWhGu0DSqB; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:32:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from uncasville.krupczak.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by uncasville.krupczak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827EE2404B9; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:32:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from rdk@localhost) by uncasville.krupczak.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p7OIWEOC011010; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:32:14 -0400
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:32:14 -0400
From: Bobby Krupczak <rdk@krupczak.org>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <20110824183214.GC10745@uncasville.krupczak.org>
References: <6BA107CB-7E6F-4720-ABDF-7B0D0733D607@apple.com> <4E53BF1F.5040708@krupczak.org> <4E5527A6.3010502@isi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E5527A6.3010502@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
Cc: Bobby Krupczak <rdk@krupczak.org>, port-srv-reg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] "xmp" service type and the unified IANA Service Name and Port Number Registry
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:31:04 -0000

Hi!

> In the IETF, parties act as individuals, not representatives of
> companies. 

I know I know; I've worked a bit within the IETF.  However, even if
the IETF does distinguish, some folks have a hard time separating
their work and ietf personas.  And, I'm sure you'll agree that its
naive to think a person's two hats do not co-mingle.

> Again, recognizing that (IMO) IANA assignments should take
> precedence, we're trying to also recognize that a voluntary
> resolution would be preferable.

I volunteer.

Thanks for the clarifications.

Bobby

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email