Re: [ppsp] WGLC for draft-ietf-ppsp-survey-02 until Dec 5th

Hi,
Sorry for the late review.

I reviewed the draft and in general it looks ready.
I was wondering if it should be a standard track or informational document.

I think that it will be good to describe the motivation for the draft in the
introduction which may be clear to the working group members but may be
unclear to others.

Some editorial comments:

1. In section 3.1.1 first paragraph there is an assumption why joost stopped
the p2p solution. I think that it we are not sure the draft should not
provide a reason but just the actual fact about where p2p is being used.

2. In section 3.1.2 first sentence "to broadcast its living streaming"
should be "to broadcast its live streaming"

BR
Roni Even

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ppsp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ppsp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Martin Stiemerling
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 5:36 PM
> To: ppsp@ietf.org
> Subject: [ppsp] WGLC for draft-ietf-ppsp-survey-02 until Dec 5th
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> This is the Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for "Survey of P2P Streaming
> Applications" (draft-ietf-ppsp-survey-02, http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-
> ietf-ppsp-survey-02.txt).
> 
> Please review the draft and send your comments to the PPSP list. Any
> type of review is appreciated, even it is saying only "I have read the
> draft and it is ok".
> However, a thorough review is required by a number of PPSP WG members
> (which is YOU!)
> 
> The WGLC starts right now and will end December 5th, 6pm PT.
> 
>   Martin
> 
> martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu
> 
> NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited
> | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL |
> Registered in England 2832014
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ppsp mailing list
> ppsp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp