Re: [Privacy-pass] Call for Adoption of Key Consistency and Discovery Draft

I also support adoption. We've committed to doing something in this space for multiple protocols, and hopefully this helps us navigate the design space a bit. 

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022, at 4:48 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> I think this is useful work, and important discussion to have in this 
> working group. To that end, I support adoption.
>
> I have a bit of a broad question as to the specific venue for the work, 
> since the document explicitly has relevance for PRIVACYPASS and OHAI 
> (and could apply to other protocols). If we do this here, we would of 
> course want cross-group discussion. Is there a rationale for one or the 
> other? I also note that draft-schwartz-ohai-consistency-doublecheck is 
> targeted at OHAI, and it really seems like these efforts should be in 
> the same place. I’m also of the opinion that the double-checking 
> technique could be merged into draft-wood-key-consistency overall.
>
> Thanks,
> Tommy
>
>> On Sep 18, 2022, at 12:42 PM, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> wrote:
>> 
>> This is a call for adoption of the Key Consistency and Discovery Draft - draft-wood-key-consistency-03 [1]. Please respond to the list and indicate if you think the PrivacyPass working group should adopt this work or not.  Also please indicate if you are willing to contribute text or review the document. The call will end on October 6, 2022.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Ben and Joe
>> 
>> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wood-key-consistency/
>> -- 
>> Privacy-pass mailing list
>> Privacy-pass@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass
>
> -- 
> Privacy-pass mailing list
> Privacy-pass@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass