IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Privacy-pass] Call for Adoption of Key Consistency and Discovery Draft

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Thu, 06 October 2022 03:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B07CC14CF09 for <privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 20:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=NH9YVnRK; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=axgqmIzI
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YB0ibdy8CpYX for <privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 20:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DE53C14CF00 for <privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 20:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153B75C016D for <privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 23:10:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 05 Oct 2022 23:10:04 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1665025804; x= 1665112204; bh=H5gT5eFrknA6rWsMbThv45ocq3u8ABkRSjKWqgXlJPg=; b=N H9YVnRKB4m7cC9HyKMMI6SYW6jBmQKbVT8iPSm7IlmkrT/tUkuM6daVhqxEcdDe9 BkaJPytMMy+LppoEaglikHyVn1rRcWQsQZlsQ80wj3pWfTMqIk3CiohEARRm1jug RppY0A756iRr6BxlTcZx9TUT0p4Tsu6Aq9Lrl2b//T/cteJYuNZgj4ozhvWH9rj+ vNL9LQDZXGrA30I4iMOzZvScVK5IEfIUP8A5ZTysvqZslUTC4xDve52qolwUCdy8 /FsND/7ISW79HgN1lvlUHlaWYeRxpYu25uofHlA3Y0TPQFIrCppwcHJfM2nC26MJ QOWQPX0GD0l/dYCEaOB2A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1665025804; x=1665112204; bh=H 5gT5eFrknA6rWsMbThv45ocq3u8ABkRSjKWqgXlJPg=; b=axgqmIzIWglBBBs0h x/CxRYh4k+xiPHbs5vekwbIQ6KjIm620QPRcWJwTwGbmseSN9wUSEXJwCYQ8DsAC mWl43aNfvdGFgLK+ZOqIv7/SCB1Aa+PuCe4NPv2ROj3JOuYLkr2g3HrVA0BILPPR hhO+Cnhrc1xnkyVrw0pLEsJKOEORJo8kQZz1JpO658p1g4BPFTEcz7vVAzMTIzuZ XK7wavf/BAmSqKYTLmGQAIbvfS0csnKtj/12N6iMu2/QtNOjmzmvA7fAXhCG6Fpk 0XARYfD2yK7Sq8TZj8yqhhusTdt7LvvNpURRRz/yzKBWFZ9RJrDx+XboPaUKhcJs le1Yg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:C0c-Y23kwsbARdcyVP_lRdt2hQBEixKyBQUt3KQqa2uBGM79_y_0jA> <xme:C0c-Y5FMpxwFIxDFTSjcx6uQ5VXm0YIOrIgqFKHJkpwSrh1oOjCQxk2E88Js7Nlrn fpI3MzoyhIRXUtZNX0>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeeigedgieekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgoufhushhpvggtthffohhmrghinhculdegledmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgr rhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeftdejveeutdfggeefgeffudeludffvddukeejudffleekhffg leelffegleeltdenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdhiohenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophih rdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:C0c-Y-43Es1-Mwag-2XvFYKql3ZXuEelmbB0c4sPOKNe7wcXfjoH-A> <xmx:C0c-Y30QTec5z8HSM0rqFGMrznYYsRy8mRVrIKZFpieCWwegMctPow> <xmx:C0c-Y5EXII7TmudgZQHhxMhvYezoOc4_IGB2cBIf9KNQHHzwHH-DhA> <xmx:DEc-Y9SPEO6NO-zb3efhUoVXXzzDAdx1KWKxl4JN9cDzS52Va2KiZg>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id D71DB234007B; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 23:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1015-gaf7d526680-fm-20220929.001-gaf7d5266
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <93b18dcf-e129-4ce8-9c3f-3ec70d4f59af@betaapp.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <04AE996B-E459-4868-948E-752BE730DA13@apple.com>
References: <CAMOjQcH6n=DzX0Mh-ufLJ9srqxP+zt6kuQgrjYs4mic6K6Wg=g@mail.gmail.com> <04AE996B-E459-4868-948E-752BE730DA13@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 14:09:43 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: privacy-pass@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/privacy-pass/b7Q8FWYGwCVaJoNZGry92ozLTWQ>
Subject: Re: [Privacy-pass] Call for Adoption of Key Consistency and Discovery Draft
X-BeenThere: privacy-pass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Pass Protocol <privacy-pass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/privacy-pass>, <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/privacy-pass/>
List-Post: <mailto:privacy-pass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass>, <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 03:10:09 -0000

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022, at 13:14, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> My suggestion is that the general technique of double checking like 
> draft-schwartz-ohai-consistency-doublecheck does — in that case once 
> with a GET request to a reverse proxy and once with a CONNECT request 
> to a forward proxy, followed by a GET — could be described in the main 
> key consistency document. I think really it boils down to “do a lookup 
> with two different proxies, or do one lookup directly and another 
> lookup with a proxy”.

Don't we already do that?

https://chris-wood.github.io/key-consistency/draft-wood-key-consistency.html#name-shared-proxy-with-key-confi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email