Re: [Privacy-pass] Call for Adoption of Key Consistency and Discovery Draft

On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 11:10 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022, at 13:14, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> > My suggestion is that the general technique of double checking like
> > draft-schwartz-ohai-consistency-doublecheck does — in that case once
> > with a GET request to a reverse proxy and once with a CONNECT request
> > to a forward proxy, followed by a GET — could be described in the main
> > key consistency document. I think really it boils down to “do a lookup
> > with two different proxies, or do one lookup directly and another
> > lookup with a proxy”.
>
> Don't we already do that?
>
>
> https://chris-wood.github.io/key-consistency/draft-wood-key-consistency.html#name-shared-proxy-with-key-confi

Must've missed that in my most recent review of the draft, but yes, this
seems perfect to me.  The informational guidance draft has a reference to
the specific-protocol draft saying "here's an example of how this could be
done".  Now we just need the double-check draft to reference back to the
informational saying "this is one protocol to implement the general
techniques discussed here" and I think we'll have the right relationships
down between the two drafts.  (Waiting for Ben or someone else to point out
if that reference is already in place too and I also missed that....)

>
>
> --
> Privacy-pass mailing list
> Privacy-pass@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass
>