Re: [privacydir] getting things started

Deirdre Mulligan <dkm@ischool.berkeley.edu> Thu, 06 January 2011 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dkm@ischool.berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: privacydir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: privacydir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07493A6CC6 for <privacydir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:56:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H4RfivkQhhZT for <privacydir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:56:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cm03fe.IST.Berkeley.EDU (cm03fe.IST.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.218.144]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C053A6F40 for <privacydir@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:56:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from azure.ischool.berkeley.edu ([128.32.226.26]) by cm03fe.ist.berkeley.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (auth plain:dkm@ischool.berkeley.edu) (envelope-from <dkm@ischool.berkeley.edu>) id 1Pav2v-000423-9p; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:58:50 -0800
Message-ID: <4D2610E8.5060105@ischool.berkeley.edu>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:58:48 -0800
From: Deirdre Mulligan <dkm@ischool.berkeley.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
References: <4D247A58.3070605@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D247A58.3070605@ieca.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: privacydir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [privacydir] getting things started
X-BeenThere: privacydir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Privacy Directorate to develop the concept of privacy considerations for IETF specifications and to review internet-drafts for privacy considerations." <privacydir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacydir>, <mailto:privacydir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/privacydir>
List-Post: <mailto:privacydir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:privacydir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacydir>, <mailto:privacydir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 18:56:45 -0000

Hi Sean et al
Can you tell me what the timeline is on the two below?
I am happy to take on some of the evaluation work under 2 and will plan 
to work it into a lab class I am running this semester looking at policy 
implications of technical design.

On topic 1, I would suggest that we think about other models--both 
decisional documents, expert committees, etc. -- in addition to the 
morris draft for iding and working through privacy issues in drafts.

thanks and happy new year.
cheers
deirdre

On 1/5/11 6:04 AM, Sean Turner wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> Thanks for agreeing to be in this directorate. The purpose is twofold:
>
> 1. Provide a place to discuss the Privacy Considerations for Internet
> Protocols draft
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morris-privacy-considerations/)
>
> 2. Test out the recommendations in that draft by reviewing selected drafts.
>
> Most that I talked to about this directorate liked the idea that it
> would be modeled on the security directorate. To do that we'll need a
> secretary to review the upcoming IESG telechat agenda
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/documents/), select drafts to
> review, and assign drafts to reviewers. What that means is that we'll
> actually need people to review drafts and send their comments to the
> directorate. The workload will, I think, at most be one draft a month
> per person. Now there are only 15 or so, but we've had 30 requests to
> join the directorate. So, the workload could actually drop.
>
> I've gotten at least one recommendation for a secretary and Tim and I
> will see if they'd be game. I suspect the assignment process will happen
> by generating the list of directorate reviewers and then just working
> through the list.
>
> Tim and I had picked out two drafts that seemed bang on appropriate for
> the directorate to review:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie/
>
> and
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipfix-anon/
>
> Tim and I both have some initial comments on the httpstate-cookie draft.
> You can see them by clicking on the IESG evaluation tab in he
> datatracker. If you think we've missed something please send email to
> this list.
>
> Nick Mathewson provided Tim and I with some comments on the ipfix-anon
> draft which I will forward shortly to the mailing list.
>
> Cheers,
>
> spt
> _______________________________________________
> privacydir mailing list
> privacydir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacydir

-- 
Deirdre K. Mulligan

Assistant Professor

School of Information

UC Berkeley

dkm@ischool.berkeley.edu

510.642.0499