IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00

Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> Tue, 15 March 2011 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <yaakov_s@rad.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E788B3A6D4B for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.431, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id apYzkM5pzp-O for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from antivir1.rad.co.il (antivir1.rad.co.il [62.0.23.193]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EE53A6C5B for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exrad5.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.28]) by antivir1.rad.co.il with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2011 17:41:35 +0200
Received: from EXUS4-DRP.ad.rad.co.il (192.114.24.119) by EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il (192.114.24.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:41:34 +0200
Received: from EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il ([fe80::ec3e:feb5:8bef:e3ba]) by exus4-drp.ad.rad.co.il ([fe80::5d6f:c2cb:2468:ee2%16]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:41:34 +0200
From: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
To: "Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)" <nick.delregno@verizon.com>
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00
Thread-Index: Acvdm33bS8HQGFieTSSSyunk7NkzBAAABRxQAWJa3CA=
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:41:33 +0000
Message-ID: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC903D16E0F@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
References: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060006CCDB13@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com>
In-Reply-To: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060006CCDB13@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.17.170.37]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: pwe3 <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:40:36 -0000

Nick, 

In section 2.2 the percentages make sense under the assumption of 18 respondents :
5.6%   =  1 / 18
11.1%  =  2 / 18
16.7%  =  3 / 18
22.2%  =  4 / 18
44.4%  =  8 / 18
77.8%  = 14 / 18 

but section 2.1 only lists 17 :
1.	Time Warner Cable
2.	Bright House Networks
3.	Tinet
4.	AboveNet
5.	Telecom New Zealand
6.	Cox Communications
7.	MTN South Africa
8.	Wipro Technologies
9.	Verizon
10.	AMS-IX
11.	Superonline
12.	Deutsche Telekom AG
13.	Internet Solution
14.	Easynet Global Services
15.	Telstra Corporation
16.	OJSC MegaFon
17.	France Telecom Orange

Did you leave someone off, or did someone answer twice ?

Y(J)S


-----Original Message-----
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 16:27
To: pwe3
Subject: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00

Folks:

The 00 draft of the PW/VCCV Implementation Survey Results have been uploaded.  I will be presenting the results at IETF80.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results/

Thanks,
Nick

Christopher N. Del Regno, PMTS
C&T, Ethernet Network Architecture & Design
400 International Pkwy
Richardson, TX  75081
972-729-3411
nick.delregno@verizon.com




-----Original Message-----
From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 8:16 AM
To: Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00


A new version of I-D, draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Nick Del Regno and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename:	 draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results
Revision:	 00
Title:		 The Pseudowire (PW) & Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results
Creation_date:	 2011-03-07
WG ID:		 Independent Submission
Number_of_pages: 16

Abstract:
Most Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) encapsulations mandate
the use of the Control Word (CW) in order to better emulate the
services for which the encapsulations have been defined.  However,
some encapulations treat the Control Word as optional.  As a result,
implementations of the CW, for encapsulations for which it is
optional, vary by equipment manufacturer, equipment model and service
provider network.  Similarly, Virtual Circuit Connectivity
Verification (VCCV) supports three Control Channel (CC) types and
multiple Connectivity Verification (CV) Types.  This flexibility has
led to reports of interoperability issues within deployed networks
and associated drafts to attempt to remedy the situation.  This
survey of the PW/VCCV user community was conducted to determine
implementation trends.  The survey and results is presented herein.
                                                                                  


The IETF Secretariat.


_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email