Re: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00

Yaakov:

I'll take a look.  We did have one respondent answer twice, with the
second the same as the first except for one addition and a response to
the open-ended question.  I merged the response and the results of that
should have been reflected in the results, but I'll double check.

Thanks,
Nick

-----Original Message-----
From: Yaakov Stein [mailto:yaakov_s@rad.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 10:42 AM
To: Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)
Cc: pwe3
Subject: RE: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00

Nick, 

In section 2.2 the percentages make sense under the assumption of 18
respondents :
5.6%   =  1 / 18
11.1%  =  2 / 18
16.7%  =  3 / 18
22.2%  =  4 / 18
44.4%  =  8 / 18
77.8%  = 14 / 18 

but section 2.1 only lists 17 :
1.	Time Warner Cable
2.	Bright House Networks
3.	Tinet
4.	AboveNet
5.	Telecom New Zealand
6.	Cox Communications
7.	MTN South Africa
8.	Wipro Technologies
9.	Verizon
10.	AMS-IX
11.	Superonline
12.	Deutsche Telekom AG
13.	Internet Solution
14.	Easynet Global Services
15.	Telstra Corporation
16.	OJSC MegaFon
17.	France Telecom Orange

Did you leave someone off, or did someone answer twice ?

Y(J)S

-----Original Message-----
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 16:27
To: pwe3
Subject: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00

Folks:

The 00 draft of the PW/VCCV Implementation Survey Results have been
uploaded.  I will be presenting the results at IETF80.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-resu
lts/

Thanks,
Nick

Christopher N. Del Regno, PMTS
C&T, Ethernet Network Architecture & Design
400 International Pkwy
Richardson, TX  75081
972-729-3411
nick.delregno@verizon.com

-----Original Message-----
From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 8:16 AM
To: Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00

A new version of I-D, draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Nick Del Regno and posted to the IETF
repository.

Filename:	 draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results
Revision:	 00
Title:		 The Pseudowire (PW) & Virtual Circuit Connectivity
Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results
Creation_date:	 2011-03-07
WG ID:		 Independent Submission
Number_of_pages: 16

Abstract:
Most Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) encapsulations mandate
the use of the Control Word (CW) in order to better emulate the
services for which the encapsulations have been defined.  However,
some encapulations treat the Control Word as optional.  As a result,
implementations of the CW, for encapsulations for which it is
optional, vary by equipment manufacturer, equipment model and service
provider network.  Similarly, Virtual Circuit Connectivity
Verification (VCCV) supports three Control Channel (CC) types and
multiple Connectivity Verification (CV) Types.  This flexibility has
led to reports of interoperability issues within deployed networks
and associated drafts to attempt to remedy the situation.  This
survey of the PW/VCCV user community was conducted to determine
implementation trends.  The survey and results is presented herein.

The IETF Secretariat.

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3