Re: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00

Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Tue, 15 March 2011 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2B03A6ACD for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.600, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gZ4mci8h5Ryo for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85483A6A40 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.133] (unknown [72.71.250.38]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A781A75E46; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:18:01 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D7F944E.2040903@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:18:01 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <538B1799-C583-4192-B170-170F00FEDA7D@lucidvision.com>
References: <14584D6EE26B314187A4F68BA206060006CCDB13@ASHEVS008.mcilink.com> <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC903D16E0F@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il> <4D7F944E.2040903@cisco.com>
To: Luca Martini <lmartini@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>, pwe3 <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:16:38 -0000

	One thing I'd ask is that we augment the survey to ask about the BFD mode for 
VCCV. It seems to have been left out of the survey, potentially skewing the results. 
As I understand it, this is the most popular mode.

	--Tom




On Mar 15, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Luca Martini wrote:

> Nick,
> Good survey, thanks for the work.
> 
> Are we going to publish this as informational ?
> I think we should .
> Also there is a mention of AToM in section 2.7 item 5 . It should be
> changed to PWE ( AToM is a cisco marketing term , so we want o keep this
> anonymous )
> Thanks.
> Luca
> 
> 
> 
> On 03/15/2011 09:41 AM, Yaakov Stein wrote:
>> Nick, 
>> 
>> In section 2.2 the percentages make sense under the assumption of 18 respondents :
>> 5.6%   =  1 / 18
>> 11.1%  =  2 / 18
>> 16.7%  =  3 / 18
>> 22.2%  =  4 / 18
>> 44.4%  =  8 / 18
>> 77.8%  = 14 / 18 
>> 
>> but section 2.1 only lists 17 :
>> 1.	Time Warner Cable
>> 2.	Bright House Networks
>> 3.	Tinet
>> 4.	AboveNet
>> 5.	Telecom New Zealand
>> 6.	Cox Communications
>> 7.	MTN South Africa
>> 8.	Wipro Technologies
>> 9.	Verizon
>> 10.	AMS-IX
>> 11.	Superonline
>> 12.	Deutsche Telekom AG
>> 13.	Internet Solution
>> 14.	Easynet Global Services
>> 15.	Telstra Corporation
>> 16.	OJSC MegaFon
>> 17.	France Telecom Orange
>> 
>> Did you leave someone off, or did someone answer twice ?
>> 
>> Y(J)S
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 16:27
>> To: pwe3
>> Subject: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00
>> 
>> Folks:
>> 
>> The 00 draft of the PW/VCCV Implementation Survey Results have been uploaded.  I will be presenting the results at IETF80.
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results/
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Nick
>> 
>> Christopher N. Del Regno, PMTS
>> C&T, Ethernet Network Architecture & Design
>> 400 International Pkwy
>> Richardson, TX  75081
>> 972-729-3411
>> nick.delregno@verizon.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 8:16 AM
>> To: Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)
>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Nick Del Regno and posted to the IETF repository.
>> 
>> Filename:	 draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results
>> Revision:	 00
>> Title:		 The Pseudowire (PW) & Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results
>> Creation_date:	 2011-03-07
>> WG ID:		 Independent Submission
>> Number_of_pages: 16
>> 
>> Abstract:
>> Most Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) encapsulations mandate
>> the use of the Control Word (CW) in order to better emulate the
>> services for which the encapsulations have been defined.  However,
>> some encapulations treat the Control Word as optional.  As a result,
>> implementations of the CW, for encapsulations for which it is
>> optional, vary by equipment manufacturer, equipment model and service
>> provider network.  Similarly, Virtual Circuit Connectivity
>> Verification (VCCV) supports three Control Channel (CC) types and
>> multiple Connectivity Verification (CV) Types.  This flexibility has
>> led to reports of interoperability issues within deployed networks
>> and associated drafts to attempt to remedy the situation.  This
>> survey of the PW/VCCV user community was conducted to determine
>> implementation trends.  The survey and results is presented herein.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pwe3 mailing list
>> pwe3@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>> _______________________________________________
>> pwe3 mailing list
>> pwe3@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>