Re: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00

Nick,
I also remember that 18 respondents have been mentioned when you've announced that the survey has been completed... 

Regards,
     Sasha

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Yaakov Stein
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:42 PM
> To: Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)
> Cc: pwe3
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-
> vccv-impl-survey-results-00
> 
> Nick,
> 
> In section 2.2 the percentages make sense under the assumption of 18
> respondents :
> 5.6%   =  1 / 18
> 11.1%  =  2 / 18
> 16.7%  =  3 / 18
> 22.2%  =  4 / 18
> 44.4%  =  8 / 18
> 77.8%  = 14 / 18
> 
> but section 2.1 only lists 17 :
> 1.	Time Warner Cable
> 2.	Bright House Networks
> 3.	Tinet
> 4.	AboveNet
> 5.	Telecom New Zealand
> 6.	Cox Communications
> 7.	MTN South Africa
> 8.	Wipro Technologies
> 9.	Verizon
> 10.	AMS-IX
> 11.	Superonline
> 12.	Deutsche Telekom AG
> 13.	Internet Solution
> 14.	Easynet Global Services
> 15.	Telstra Corporation
> 16.	OJSC MegaFon
> 17.	France Telecom Orange
> 
> Did you leave someone off, or did someone answer twice ?
> 
> Y(J)S
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 16:27
> To: pwe3
> Subject: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-
> vccv-impl-survey-results-00
> 
> Folks:
> 
> The 00 draft of the PW/VCCV Implementation Survey Results have been
> uploaded.  I will be presenting the results at IETF80.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-
> results/
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick
> 
> Christopher N. Del Regno, PMTS
> C&T, Ethernet Network Architecture & Design
> 400 International Pkwy
> Richardson, TX  75081
> 972-729-3411
> nick.delregno@verizon.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 8:16 AM
> To: Delregno, Christopher N (Nick DelRegno)
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-
> survey-results-00
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Nick Del Regno and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-delregno-pw-vccv-impl-survey-results
> Revision:	 00
> Title:		 The Pseudowire (PW) & Virtual Circuit Connectivity
> Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results
> Creation_date:	 2011-03-07
> WG ID:		 Independent Submission
> Number_of_pages: 16
> 
> Abstract:
> Most Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) encapsulations mandate
> the use of the Control Word (CW) in order to better emulate the
> services for which the encapsulations have been defined.  However,
> some encapulations treat the Control Word as optional.  As a result,
> implementations of the CW, for encapsulations for which it is
> optional, vary by equipment manufacturer, equipment model and service
> provider network.  Similarly, Virtual Circuit Connectivity
> Verification (VCCV) supports three Control Channel (CC) types and
> multiple Connectivity Verification (CV) Types.  This flexibility has
> led to reports of interoperability issues within deployed networks
> and associated drafts to attempt to remedy the situation.  This
> survey of the PW/VCCV user community was conducted to determine
> implementation trends.  The survey and results is presented herein.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3