Re: [PWE3] VCCV usage

<neil.2.harrison@bt.com> Thu, 18 November 2010 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <neil.2.harrison@bt.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65FF3A6834 for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:37:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.844
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.844 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.202, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yPFUsyupnaJo for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:37:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpe1.intersmtp.com (smtp63.intersmtp.COM [62.239.224.236]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D57E3A680D for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:37:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EVMHT66-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net (10.36.3.103) by RDW083A007ED63.smtp-e3.hygiene.service (10.187.98.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:38:37 +0000
Received: from EMV62-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net ([169.254.2.214]) by EVMHT66-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net ([10.36.3.103]) with mapi; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:38:37 +0000
From: neil.2.harrison@bt.com
To: mustapha.aissaoui@alcatel-lucent.com, cpignata@cisco.com
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:38:30 +0000
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] VCCV usage
Thread-Index: AcuF/Gw00sZd7Xv4R8+CrpTrRYWlewAZ3qGAACPz7YA=
Message-ID: <6D3D47CB84BDE349BC23BF1C94E316E44002026A7E@EMV62-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net>
References: <C9087057.3B57%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> <4CE2D8A4.4010903@cisco.com> <5DF53972F7E9134782DCE51624466FE50ACFB50E62@USNAVSXCHMBSC2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com> <960EC8F9A775AB40BF58D8953342D86303281232@XMB-RCD-206.cisco.com> <5DF53972F7E9134782DCE51624466FE50ACFB50EAE@USNAVSXCHMBSC2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com> <7A808A63-83FA-4B97-9AC8-7A09A2297FB0@cisco.com> <5DF53972F7E9134782DCE51624466FE50ACFB51070@USNAVSXCHMBSC2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <5DF53972F7E9134782DCE51624466FE50ACFB51070@USNAVSXCHMBSC2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: lmartini@cisco.com, yaakov_s@rad.com, pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV usage
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:37:51 -0000

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
> Sent: 17 November 2010 19:41
> To: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
> Cc: pwe3@ietf.org; Yaakov Stein; Luca Martini (lmartini)
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV usage
> 
> Carlos,
> I meant to say the VCCV capability options must be agreed 
> upon by all nodes in the path of the MS-PW as explained in the draft.
NH=> The *nodes* in which layer network?  And how does one know which layer network one is in from looking only at the DP information?  Will this apply to both MPLS and MPLS-TP?

regards, Neil