Re: [PWE3] Comments on draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-03.txt

Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> Thu, 18 June 2009 02:45 UTC

Return-Path: <rcallon@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E523A6C0F for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.346
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.346 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.252, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XgdCkEddEaHW for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og107.obsmtp.com (exprod7og107.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.167]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC453A6820 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob107.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSjmqZNFbU3wSLMVrEPfYagRfYNsrGYYF@postini.com; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:46:00 PDT
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:45:48 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:45:47 -0400
From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
To: BOCCI Matthew <Matthew.Bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>, "draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:45:45 -0400
Thread-Topic: Comments on draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-03.txt
Thread-Index: AcnvV5mAL6RQiHBISN2fhvcapyimEgAZsNEQ
Message-ID: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB1770498239ADDF5@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <0458D2EE0C36744BABB36BE37805C29A03FB7946@FRVELSMBS11.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>
In-Reply-To: <0458D2EE0C36744BABB36BE37805C29A03FB7946@FRVELSMBS11.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB1770498239ADDF5EMBX01WFjnprn_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Comments on draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-03.txt
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:45:49 -0000

>  Authors,
>  In reviewing the draft while preparing the proto statement, I have noted a few
> comments (mostly derived from ID NITS), as follows:
>
>  -       The draft is informational, but contains RFC2119 like language e.g.
>          capitalised SHOULD. Please check though the draft and revise accordingly.


Without commenting on the specifics of whether this language is appropriate as used in this particular draft,
in general RFC2119 language is permitted in informational documents.

Thanks, Ross