IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] Comments on draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-03.txt

"BOCCI Matthew" <Matthew.Bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 18 June 2009 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Matthew.Bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D2A3A67EB for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AVNE79cEAd77 for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB20E3A6B79 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRVELSBHS03.ad2.ad.alcatel.com (frvelsbhs03.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [155.132.6.75]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/ICT) with ESMTP id n5I88rVs021000; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:08:54 +0200
Received: from FRVELSMBS11.ad2.ad.alcatel.com ([155.132.6.33]) by FRVELSBHS03.ad2.ad.alcatel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:08:53 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9EFEC.0550433C"
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:08:51 +0200
Message-ID: <0458D2EE0C36744BABB36BE37805C29A03FB7B98@FRVELSMBS11.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>
In-Reply-To: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB1770498239ADDF5@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Comments on draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-03.txt
Thread-Index: AcnvV5mAL6RQiHBISN2fhvcapyimEgAZsNEQAAtd/XA=
References: <0458D2EE0C36744BABB36BE37805C29A03FB7946@FRVELSMBS11.ad2.ad.alcatel.com> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB1770498239ADDF5@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
From: BOCCI Matthew <Matthew.Bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport@tools.ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jun 2009 08:08:53.0787 (UTC) FILETIME=[0559EEB0:01C9EFEC]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 155.132.188.80
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Comments on draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-03.txt
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:09:08 -0000

Ross,

 

In that case, the draft should probably also include a 'Specification of
requirements' section and a reference to RFC2119.

 

Regards

 

Matthew

 

________________________________

From: Ross Callon [mailto:rcallon@juniper.net] 
Sent: 18 June 2009 03:46
To: BOCCI Matthew; draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport@tools.ietf.org
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-03.txt

 

 

>  Authors,

>  In reviewing the draft while preparing the proto statement, I have
noted a few

> comments (mostly derived from ID NITS), as follows:

> 

>  -       The draft is informational, but contains RFC2119 like
language e.g.

>          capitalised SHOULD. Please check though the draft and revise
accordingly.

 

 

Without commenting on the specifics of whether this language is
appropriate as used in this particular draft, 

in general RFC2119 language is permitted in informational documents. 

 

Thanks, Ross

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email