RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking

Paul Moore <paulmo@microsoft.com> Fri, 24 July 1998 18:42 UTC

Delivery-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 14:42:21 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id OAA23045 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 14:42:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id OAA18738 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 14:42:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA04892 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 14:42:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 24 Jul 1998 14:37:31 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA04327 for ipp-outgoing; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 14:33:32 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <CB6657D3A5E0D111A97700805FFE6587BF6F39@red-msg-51.dns.microsoft.com>
From: Paul Moore <paulmo@microsoft.com>
To: "'Turner, Randy'" <rturner@sharplabs.com>, "'ipp@pwg.org'" <ipp@pwg.org>
Subject: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 11:33:19 -0700
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2328.0)
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org

I dont see where it says that a server must support chunking. It says I must
support 1.1. Maybe I am reading it wrong (I guess thats why we have
bake-offs)

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Turner, Randy [SMTP:rturner@sharplabs.com]
> Sent:	Friday, July 24, 1998 10:48 AM
> To:	'ipp@pwg.org'
> Subject:	RE: IPP> Implementation question re.:  chunking
> 
> 
> Well, I'm assuming since we "last-call'd" these documents in the WG,
> that everybody is in agreement that an implementation that doesn't
> support chunking isn't compliant.
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
> 		-----Original Message-----
> 		From:	Paul Moore [mailto:paulmo@microsoft.com]
> 		Sent:	Friday, July 24, 1998 10:25 AM
> 		To:	'Randy Turner'; Carl Kugler
> 		Cc:	ipp@pwg.org
> 		Subject:	RE: IPP> Implementation question re.:
> chunking
> 
> 		You might find that some implementations dont support
> chunking.
> 
> 		> -----Original Message-----
> 		> From:	Randy Turner [SMTP:rturner@sharplabs.com]
> 		> Sent:	Friday, July 24, 1998 10:05 AM
> 		> To:	Carl Kugler
> 		> Cc:	ipp@pwg.org
> 		> Subject:	Re: IPP> Implementation question re.:
> chunking
> 		> 
> 		> At 04:51 PM 7/24/98 +0000, you wrote:
> 		> >draft-ietf-ipp-protocol-06.txt says the client and
> server MUST support
> 		> the
> 		> "chunked" transfer encoding when receiving.  My
> question is:  Can we count
> 		> on this?  I.e., if our client always transmits
> requests using the
> 		> "chunked"
> 		> transfer encoding, will we be able to interoperate
> with the vast majority
> 		> of IPP server implementations?
> 		> >
> 		> >    -Carl
> 		> 
> 		> 
> 		> There are no vast majority of IPP server
> implementations (yet). I think
> 		> the
> 		> only worry is if someone plans to deploy IPP behind a
> generic web server
> 		> that doesn't support chunking. However, Apache and
> most other of the more
> 		> popular HTTP/1.1 servers will support this. It should
> definitely be a
> 		> bullet item (checkoff item) at the upcoming bake-off,
> however.
> 		> 
> 		> Randy
> 		> 
> 		> >