RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking
Paul Moore <paulmo@microsoft.com> Fri, 24 July 1998 18:42 UTC
Delivery-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 14:42:21 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id OAA23045 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 14:42:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id OAA18738 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 14:42:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA04892 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 14:42:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 24 Jul 1998 14:37:31 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA04327 for ipp-outgoing; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 14:33:32 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <CB6657D3A5E0D111A97700805FFE6587BF6F39@red-msg-51.dns.microsoft.com>
From: Paul Moore <paulmo@microsoft.com>
To: "'Turner, Randy'" <rturner@sharplabs.com>, "'ipp@pwg.org'" <ipp@pwg.org>
Subject: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 11:33:19 -0700
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2328.0)
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org
I dont see where it says that a server must support chunking. It says I must support 1.1. Maybe I am reading it wrong (I guess thats why we have bake-offs) > -----Original Message----- > From: Turner, Randy [SMTP:rturner@sharplabs.com] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 1998 10:48 AM > To: 'ipp@pwg.org' > Subject: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking > > > Well, I'm assuming since we "last-call'd" these documents in the WG, > that everybody is in agreement that an implementation that doesn't > support chunking isn't compliant. > > Randy > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Moore [mailto:paulmo@microsoft.com] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 1998 10:25 AM > To: 'Randy Turner'; Carl Kugler > Cc: ipp@pwg.org > Subject: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: > chunking > > You might find that some implementations dont support > chunking. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Randy Turner [SMTP:rturner@sharplabs.com] > > Sent: Friday, July 24, 1998 10:05 AM > > To: Carl Kugler > > Cc: ipp@pwg.org > > Subject: Re: IPP> Implementation question re.: > chunking > > > > At 04:51 PM 7/24/98 +0000, you wrote: > > >draft-ietf-ipp-protocol-06.txt says the client and > server MUST support > > the > > "chunked" transfer encoding when receiving. My > question is: Can we count > > on this? I.e., if our client always transmits > requests using the > > "chunked" > > transfer encoding, will we be able to interoperate > with the vast majority > > of IPP server implementations? > > > > > > -Carl > > > > > > There are no vast majority of IPP server > implementations (yet). I think > > the > > only worry is if someone plans to deploy IPP behind a > generic web server > > that doesn't support chunking. However, Apache and > most other of the more > > popular HTTP/1.1 servers will support this. It should > definitely be a > > bullet item (checkoff item) at the upcoming bake-off, > however. > > > > Randy > > > > >
- IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Carl Kugler
- Re: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Randy Turner
- RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Manros, Carl-Uno B
- RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Paul Moore
- RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Turner, Randy
- RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Paul Moore
- Re: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Carl Kugler
- Re: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Carl Kugler
- RE: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Larry Masinter
- Re: RE: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chu… Carl Kugler
- Re: RE: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chu… Carl Kugler