IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking

"Manros, Carl-Uno B" <cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com> Fri, 24 July 1998 17:27 UTC

Delivery-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:27:25 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id NAA21908 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:27:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id NAA18289 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:27:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA01652 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:27:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:22:46 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA00995 for ipp-outgoing; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:16:45 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <194C28463877D111A2A100805F15CE85409C87@x-crt-es-ms1.cp10.es.xerox.com>
From: "Manros, Carl-Uno B" <cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com>
To: 'Carl Kugler' <kugler@us.ibm.com>, ipp@pwg.org
Subject: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 10:13:44 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org

Carl,

I think this is a good example of the things that we need to put in an
Implementor's Guide document. Formally, as we are referencing IETF's
HTTP 1.1, all IPP implementations MUST support "chunking". However, I
think it would be smart for an actual implementation to also support
using HTTP 1.0 to allow for maximum interoperability. E.g. in Xerox we
have had to base our current client code (written in Java) on HTTP 1.0,
as the JavaSoft libraries do not yet support some of the HTTP 1.1
features. These problems will disappear over time, but we also need to
get things working short term.

Carl-Uno

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carl Kugler [mailto:kugler@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 1998 9:52 AM
> To: ipp@pwg.org
> Subject: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking
> 
> 
> draft-ietf-ipp-protocol-06.txt says the client and server 
> MUST support the "chunked" transfer encoding when receiving.  
> My question is:  Can we count on this?  I.e., if our client 
> always transmits requests using the "chunked" transfer 
> encoding, will we be able to interoperate with the vast 
> majority of IPP server implementations?
> 
>     -Carl
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email