IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking

"Carl Kugler" <kugler@us.ibm.com> Fri, 24 July 1998 17:03 UTC

Delivery-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:03:57 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id NAA21701 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:03:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id NAA18072 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:03:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA29845 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 13:03:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 24 Jul 1998 12:57:35 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA29287 for ipp-outgoing; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 12:52:54 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 16:51:43 -0000
Message-ID: <19980724165143.21038.qmail@m2.findmail.com>
From: Carl Kugler <kugler@us.ibm.com>
Subject: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking
To: ipp@pwg.org
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org

draft-ietf-ipp-protocol-06.txt says the client and server MUST support the "chunked" transfer encoding when receiving.  My question is:  Can we count on this?  I.e., if our client always transmits requests using the "chunked" transfer encoding, will we be able to interoperate with the vast majority of IPP server implementations?

    -Carl