Re: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking
"Carl Kugler" <kugler@us.ibm.com> Fri, 24 July 1998 19:36 UTC
Delivery-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 15:36:25 -0400
Return-Path: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id PAA24738 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 15:36:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id PAA19114 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 15:36:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA06226 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 15:36:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 24 Jul 1998 15:32:31 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA05668 for ipp-outgoing; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 15:30:16 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 19:29:18 -0000
Message-ID: <19980724192918.13710.qmail@m2.findmail.com>
From: Carl Kugler <kugler@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking
In-Reply-To: <CB6657D3A5E0D111A97700805FFE6587BF6F39@red-msg-51.dns.microsoft.com>
To: ipp@pwg.org
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org
HTTP/1.1 imlies chunking. Quote: draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", section 3.6.1, "Chunked Transfer Coding": "All HTTP/1.1 applications MUST be able to receive and decode the chunked transfer coding..." -Carl >I dont see where it says that a server must support chunking. It says I must > support 1.1. Maybe I am reading it wrong (I guess thats why we have > bake-offs) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Turner, Randy [SMTP:rturner@sharplabs.com] > > Sent: Friday, July 24, 1998 10:48 AM > > To: 'ipp@pwg.org' > > Subject: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking > > > > > > Well, I'm assuming since we "last-call'd" these documents in the WG, > > that everybody is in agreement that an implementation that doesn't > > support chunking isn't compliant. > > > > Randy > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Moore [mailto:paulmo@microsoft.com] > > Sent: Friday, July 24, 1998 10:25 AM > > To: 'Randy Turner'; Carl Kugler > > Cc: ipp@pwg.org > > Subject: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: > > chunking > > > > You might find that some implementations dont support > > chunking. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Randy Turner [SMTP:rturner@sharplabs.com] > > > Sent: Friday, July 24, 1998 10:05 AM > > > To: Carl Kugler > > > Cc: ipp@pwg.org > > > Subject: Re: IPP> Implementation question re.: > > chunking > > > > > > At 04:51 PM 7/24/98 +0000, you wrote: > > > >draft-ietf-ipp-protocol-06.txt says the client and > > server MUST support > > > the > > > "chunked" transfer encoding when receiving. My > > question is: Can we count > > > on this? I.e., if our client always transmits > > requests using the > > > "chunked" > > > transfer encoding, will we be able to interoperate > > with the vast majority > > > of IPP server implementations? > > > > > > > > -Carl > > > > > > > > > There are no vast majority of IPP server > > implementations (yet). I think > > > the > > > only worry is if someone plans to deploy IPP behind a > > generic web server > > > that doesn't support chunking. However, Apache and > > most other of the more > > > popular HTTP/1.1 servers will support this. It should > > definitely be a > > > bullet item (checkoff item) at the upcoming bake-off, > > however. > > > > > > Randy > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message: http://www.findmail.com/list/ipp/?start=4181 Start a FREE email list at http://www.FindMail.com/
- IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Carl Kugler
- Re: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Randy Turner
- RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Manros, Carl-Uno B
- RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Paul Moore
- RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Turner, Randy
- RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Paul Moore
- Re: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Carl Kugler
- Re: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Carl Kugler
- RE: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking Larry Masinter
- Re: RE: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chu… Carl Kugler
- Re: RE: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chu… Carl Kugler