Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Better describe the use of Preferred Address (#3354)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Tue, 21 January 2020 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1842B120832 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:16:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OSEhFduQPc1y for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:16:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-15.smtp.github.com (out-15.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F04CA12083F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:16:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-5825cd4.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.22.68]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB542615A1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:16:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1579565772; bh=wR2n5caC9NZtgHOfLaomtEUPsMaY1D5PRq3FVW4OGEM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=BAXFr+kBujDg8SOi/eDXne/MS90m2ZCRYoATG/LYh+jE0lcUuBjrc3lCP3177/4lv oGLy9qJs26Vquh/XdzdF3x28B+N/Gh4tzK1lNES2VspSZyRHlZrhSe52FVFXgAeH2v KVWgd5ZYOpsAe9kuK/aqWG/wsbKFUkdehA3Ntohk=
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:16:12 -0800
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2LXEKNOF2KY7IAWIV4GN2UZEVBNHHCBWRIJQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3354/review/345579681@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3354@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3354@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Better describe the use of Preferred Address (#3354)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e2642cc10e43_b883fc3d7ccd960339020"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/3CL8wNf1uNVWS0pGuPCitwcAGjo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:16:15 -0000

kazuho commented on this pull request.



> @@ -2194,11 +2194,13 @@ linked by any other entity.
 At any time, endpoints MAY change the Destination Connection ID they send to a
 value that has not been used on another path.
 
-An endpoint MUST use a new connection ID if it initiates connection migration as
-described in {{initiating-migration}} or probes a new network path as described
-in {{probing}}.  An endpoint MUST use a new connection ID in response to a
-change in the address of a peer if the packet with the new peer address uses an
-active connection ID that has not been previously used by the peer.
+An endpoint MUST use a new connection ID when it initiates connection migration
+as described in {{initiating-migration}} or {{preferred-address}}, or when it
+probes a new network path as described in {{probing}}, and MUST NOT reuse

Yes. IIUC, the requirements are:
* A client MUST NOT reuse a CID across multiple paths (being identified by the 5 tuple).
* A server MUST NOT reuse a CID across multiple path, with the exception being that it MAY use a CID that has been used on one path on another path, if that new path is opened by a packet sent by a client using DCID for the old path.

We can combine these statements into one, and say that: An endpoint MUST NOT reuse a CID across multiple paths, with the exception being that it MAY use a CID that has been used on one path on another path, if that new path is opened by a packet sent by a client using DCID for the old path.

I think that is the most precise definition I can think of. If the above sounds fine, I can work on it.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3354#discussion_r368764634