IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rename "retransmittable" frames and packets (#1595)

Ryan Hamilton <notifications@github.com> Sun, 11 November 2018 03:59 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27633128CF2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:59:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t1hTg2qWjJ2U for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:59:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA801200D7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:59:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:59:14 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1541908754; bh=5GuF+F0efKuYWGADeYwDbJlLxp4J0gbNxp10DrkPIt8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=0lcNPJ/KHkvcX6cwzTTXog+3h9YyCsByPfMA0vHqrRI9cZuVunKM3pifJBLjxTvSu 8Eho1XbzsSWVZ/g/zZqm+/rj3ggh6hRZvMkebcVVBWR3uZ5JHb2JqZN1K6bfIsXPC7 1AenfFZjgAaL1BRT0s963v0r+aZVnTg3Zjuq/Ypo=
From: Ryan Hamilton <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab28c111a8c7ef16dff2c32a92c9bfd9d59115c94092cf0000000117ff6b1292a169ce147c6344@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1595/437641914@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1595@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1595@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rename "retransmittable" frames and packets (#1595)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be7a91272174_72613fadf8cd45c0202851"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: RyanAtGoogle
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/5-EceaJCN9JbzpAxFCvNGnIiIec>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 03:59:17 -0000

On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Something like "wack", "tracked", "ackent" don't have obvious english
>> language interpretations
>>
>> I disagree. While *wack* (not an adjective!) and *tracked* (only implies
>> action tangentially) are indeed poor choices, *ackent* belongs to a
>> family of English adjectives ending with *ent* wherein *ent* implies
>> action related to the suffixed part of the word:
>>
>>    - indulgent
>>
>> It's perhaps worth pointing out that an "indulgent" person is a person
who indulges. Which might imply that an ackent packet is packet that
ACKs... meaning a packet which contains an ACK as opposed to a packet which
elicits an ACK :/


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1595#issuecomment-437641914

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email