IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PRIORITY frame on control stream referencing unopened request stream (#2502)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Thu, 09 May 2019 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC21120145 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2019 13:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZmO_FboES_sG for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2019 13:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A28BB12006B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2019 13:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 13:20:48 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1557433248; bh=AmspkhWbFSCmpwobtHaduinP77mz5Lt5VJIDUIsmeN0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ObjxqjpvZyeO7m2d68+UtpIhc9JTfj434cSf1bYGkoPS/6W9UnlNX9vlEx8XBa6z2 XRP1+8u6LxFvtXtBOvKYCHGmViJl66d1/EWHW2wUeXeh3Hanp9xGANs6n8l5ALqdXN glqxNkjN3Y088vpsfLHZAGxJKqvyN07m4YuOzITE=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK63BALRYB3CBV3OAMF24G7CBEVBNHHBR4DCTQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2502/491051373@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2502@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2502@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PRIORITY frame on control stream referencing unopened request stream (#2502)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd48ba0841d6_28103fab1accd968201955"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/EsIKYdAMCDLT0xnvUfnUX4RUJj8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 20:20:51 -0000

Patrick Meenan knows more about this than I do, but I think the ability to evenly round robin between resources at a given priority value is sufficient, given that's what he recently proposed in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2019JanMar/0073.html

I have a hard time imagining a browser that would be able to pick a better weight than equal weighting for images.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-491051373

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email