Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify ACK of ACKs and bundling a PING (#2794)

David Schinazi <notifications@github.com> Mon, 01 July 2019 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02731200D8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KHfGjNfvZ6b7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A57501200C1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 12:50:05 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1562010605; bh=E7njnCxI5+qz3Xu5ezDj/aHuMJlUzNzLs8DHk4+mSG4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=kT0W1fSwAjhr3tqduip1Ings0lv5uw8zr2U/C4DkKEO9xoX9N0G4iB5LuM9v4xN/w lNme45sayQ9+8MRQA6n4oa8RELRtMAUWIe5hSejdeAhRc/17rSRevtBKMtMGGZtQGx YGQJzjrVECkN2DeKqoXb9XknEJVxIL4leENhUEPg=
From: David Schinazi <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYU44RE4O43HKP7KKF3E6LG3EVBNHHBWNLZWA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2794/review/256529083@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2794@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2794@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify ACK of ACKs and bundling a PING (#2794)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d1a63ed5498a_25d33fc704acd9641295a7"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/N_Fn0I7JLbXm_Uqq2YBkvt-W6Hs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 19:50:09 -0000

DavidSchinazi commented on this pull request.



> -ACK or PADDING frames when sending ACK frames in response to other packets.
+An endpoint sends ACK frames to acknowledge packets it has received and
+processed. Sending ACK frames is the primary mechanism for advancing the state
+of a connection.
+
+Packets containing only ACK frames are not congestion controlled, so there are
+limits on how frequently they can be sent.  An endpoint MUST NOT send more than
+one packet containing only an ACK frame per received ACK-eliciting packet
+(one containing frames other than ACK and/or PADDING).  An endpoint MUST NOT
+send a packet containing only an ACK frame in response to a non-ACK-eliciting
+packet (one containing only ACK and/or PADDING frames), even if there are
+packet gaps which precede the received packet. Limiting the sending of ACK
+frames avoids creating an indefinite feedback loop of acknowledgements,
+which could prevent the connection from ever becoming idle. The endpoint MUST
+however acknowledge non-ACK-eliciting packets when sending ACK frames in
+response to Ack-eliciting packets.

s/Ack-eliciting/ACK-eliciting/

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2794#pullrequestreview-256529083