Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify ACK of ACKs and bundling a PING (#2794)

MikkelFJ <> Tue, 18 June 2019 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EF612001B for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.605
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8GcXqxzz5EaP for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E2541202A7 for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:06:20 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1560899180; bh=zjytZuq+wgv5qMdN0Nubc6LUlYoJIr/w/Pwf7j75b54=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Fyc0ntBBorZ90LGf30LfgUViCp+mRCWHRJNgmmu17SyEt9wGfl+x8RYsW6gR/tMMP BuBJlle08ShlUS8F+54lJRKcuvHCfhbNSuQ/vigqrukcxRUeq/jZL7wDm6uriD5oO9 Vo2O+nfTfBoJWuq1kUArIljzXAmWolLE/K7xQC8E=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2794/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify ACK of ACKs and bundling a PING (#2794)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d096e6c24eee_27d63fea35ecd95c175861"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 23:06:24 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.

> @@ -2884,10 +2884,10 @@ needing acknowledgement are received.  The sender can use the receiver's
 Strategies and implications of the frequency of generating acknowledgments are
 discussed in more detail in {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}.
-ACK-only packets are only sent in response to ACK-eliciting packets, so a
-receiver that is only sending ACK frames will only receive acknowledgements
-for its packets if the sender includes them in packets with ACK-eliciting
-frames.  A sender SHOULD bundle ACK frames with other frames when possible.
+An endpoint that is only sending ACK frames won't receive acknowledgments from

won't -> will not

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: