Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Idle timeout indicates you will timeout (#3099)

ianswett <> Tue, 29 October 2019 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E9A1200A4 for <>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qvdiXqszewO2 for <>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7810120111 for <>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CF1261640 for <>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572368399; bh=BSCKPkwVpNk//+C4wCy/bghzuAY4ahFbGAckAo6DFLI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ZdywF1aZVq0yYX/UOR9lPP4iP/Av/L/txTOMFZDuP3BxighaGloHGLHRI9lhwXRI9 kg0a+WVURohnr8mF7qVlqX47CzYCtqxrPdPHKWgiWsI3UCfWRiVs7bYUZwn+EHHTUW RDinl7mddQ/0jvLOy4eXAhkSwbI5qwew77XBJQNg=
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:59:58 -0700
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3099/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Idle timeout indicates you will timeout (#3099)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db8700ee771d_6f33f9b566cd960270922"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:00:01 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.

> @@ -4593,11 +4595,12 @@ endpoints send PING frames without coordination can produce an excessive number
 of packets and poor performance.
 A connection will time out if no packets are sent or received for a period
-longer than the time specified in the idle_timeout transport parameter (see
-{{termination}}).  However, state in middleboxes might time out earlier than
-that.  Though REQ-5 in {{?RFC4787}} recommends a 2 minute timeout interval,
-experience shows that sending packets every 15 to 30 seconds is necessary to
-prevent the majority of middleboxes from losing state for UDP flows.
+longer than the time specified in the max_idle_timeout transport parameter

Thanks, I went for negotiated using.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: