Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] handling of coalesced packets with decryption errors creates DoS opportunity (#2308)

Kazuho Oku <> Thu, 09 May 2019 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD6012010F for <>; Wed, 8 May 2019 17:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.465
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3uDCW73-lpzl for <>; Wed, 8 May 2019 17:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F09120098 for <>; Wed, 8 May 2019 17:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 17:24:03 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1557361443; bh=3FgCwmsa/5Zee8UMJVIrOfFlLtRv1gyMGmMQyEOSY1Q=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=rCiZbmMjQsXiylUcf2VwlFuHVgmiqHvRm8xnKyku3QE9wlDmu03h/Wjb6n/hYgc1v xahs7DFaGN38++JQxTI1EnTZaTsHyIPwvyIErvf6FXMtZvejNblR5yF/VUZExnsTNR AAniwaXWwp6NnzJPoUceTR0f6kIxBdJ+5XJPa/eA=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2308/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] handling of coalesced packets with decryption errors creates DoS opportunity (#2308)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd3732363bd6_54153f9b0e6cd96c89339"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 00:24:07 -0000

@huitema I agree that it's likely that we would not have deadlocks. But I think it's beneficial to specify how a server should not drop coalesced packets, because there would be performance issues if there is a disagreement about what is possible between the endpoints (one of the concerns being PMTU probes using coalesced packets (

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: