Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework section on persistent congestion (#3961)

Kazu Yamamoto <> Thu, 20 August 2020 07:09 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1733A08B3 for <>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jCykrv5fyQfD for <>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F0253A08AB for <>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A3F840205 for <>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1597907383; bh=aS7nsUGW0yayHI64lYb81gda3FlmPghVeDoIBFlwCPk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=S7E4VXwqqmQkbFdpISxYsB0bI7kj/WbLIz7y2BsDcvZKGh3Ss9kj5t1AbH2RXgF1V 6SRhundxd/E8eYk6MLL5/QydIzahglhWf8LMfPe+ezqBLTilfhAbrkIS4nPvEdwmwg yQbtsmOxRVaHOoxZfbCZpBDsTBymlWju74pXmbFg=
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:09:43 -0700
From: Kazu Yamamoto <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3961/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework section on persistent congestion (#3961)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f3e21b7528af_44981964360283"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazu-yamamoto
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 07:09:46 -0000

It would be necessary to use much resource to implement the detection of persistent congestion described here because of "across all packet spaces". So, let me ask a basic question. What is the motivation to define persistent congestion across all packet spaces? Isn't it good enough to limit persistent congestion only to 1-RTT?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: