IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be in us, not ms (#3363)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 20 January 2020 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA73712094B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:18:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t7gpExolwbyv for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:18:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-26.smtp.github.com (out-26.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B60FD120958 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:18:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-b19c547.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-b19c547.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.66]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D507A280061 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:18:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1579547912; bh=JGva9+Jb08UpNve5dY8KRoa3hxP6Ozs5tn+sw1FP7Cs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ogV/yJtLM+cyn/o2jAvDaDE1sZVePq9XPXUC4CV+oBaxzcU18UX16Ze+keOtEHNMc P5qZNC7n/AmZLmiqQ2E/WIpLq0z49aAUF+WtnlUj3ohT6v2/d3pDFvkZT3CcfabJ7G i6zdAp4tVdaycPyP7EiCLt3siO+KNYkJ7LU0kEko=
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:18:32 -0800
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYZC6URSS6YBPSM4WV4GMXYREVBNHHCBYTETM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363/576401021@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] max_ack_delay should be in us, not ms (#3363)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e25fd08c5681_3cf73f87b68cd96c70235"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/UOjdiQfIjqDVEEky17sFl5MPpvU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:18:38 -0000

Yes, I agree it's a design issue.  

I confirmed with the TCP team at Google and they agreed microseconds was a better choice than millis.

I will say that we can punt this and make the extension Jana and I are working on specify it in us, but that seems a bit hacky to me given we haven't yet shipped QUIC v1.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3363#issuecomment-576401021

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email