Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)

David Schinazi <> Wed, 11 December 2019 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188241200F6 for <>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:49:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6txG4WF7zE7e for <>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:49:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA20812008C for <>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:49:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:49:46 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1576025386; bh=V5fCOhERsQhfMLHZgw5/aCEwodHl3hOfLWX++3rrVNw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ixLORszqJlKmFykhpiXZpWElkiFpphTPIiQQOHmjbyaqi/NvFiS4eewfZe0YMu4Mq n3jSQ7tXrqEtlApanvlTNhahxQE4u0LDty+T00GVbZnAcpSuJZjS6IxUM0OjmJN3v2 EvcDXtkSrE0N6N4AQ67nSeEmM4WONreX6IbyEwXg=
From: David Schinazi <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3294/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5df03d2a886_6bca3f8c712cd96c1532d2"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 00:49:48 -0000

@dtikhonov apologies for splitting hairs, but since we're discussing process: the QUIC WG does not establish consensus in meeting rooms. All decisions are made in consensus calls from the chairs on the mailing list. What you described was what was said in Cupertino, which reflects some attendants' opinions, not any decision from the WG. The purpose of this issue it to establish the consensus of the WG: in order to close the issue we will need to establish whether we have consensus to make this change (close by merging PR) or consensus to close without action.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: