Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Question on ECN validation (#3733)

Lars Eggert <> Fri, 05 June 2020 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7CE3A00D2 for <>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.991
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.991 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, GB_SUMOF=5, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DLR-B51HwHzP for <>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 923673A0D28 for <>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD29CE009F for <>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1591363195; bh=WHUJSC5WEyUQ6/EQjpFoUapFwhRh/el5x8NnRp0bzY4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=m+Lgz3R71x6YAdh/oYq9QnuSWkkPoyZDBSmdYluOWGOfNF8fmGeLCQXu7JBaTqQWa ClGTnOawdKCS9ZFpKoCIPVH2oU4QgDKohdeVifdQcVx74uVqPdlR7Rm6dl6YOxh6ht JAHNWK5sx4JnIpwQlKRDoYWOJ8NOT+wExEPW6sQ4=
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 06:19:55 -0700
From: Lars Eggert <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Question on ECN validation (#3733)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eda467bbcd32_669d3f90e94cd95c11719"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: larseggert
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:20:20 -0000

Actually, this doesn't make sense to me:
> Total increase is increase of ECT(0)+increase of ECT(1)+increase if CE compared to local current count of ECT(0)+ECT(1)+CE. 

The increase is the value in the current ACK frame minus the current local reference value. A sum of those increases is always going to be less than the sum of the total reference values?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: