Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Pad path validation in both directions (#4241)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Tue, 20 October 2020 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3B03A1049 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hQVWUo7nLau9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-25.smtp.github.com (out-25.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1FAB3A102C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-d84fe50.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.105.69]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B3A08840623 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1603223050; bh=6vRogeqoJmX3iEOA/jkQy9ENkN/Wo6Quelfta5qYlBk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=QVwkOjzuArpkMZgNVj5kC4NdMdqBMYYQufGhY8QjNHysSk5s0gvLL44JEJewB+Vq2 B0HodoYdAtrHu4KUQzKIkl8+ZgKN9W4k81j3htuQiPuWwjiq4eW3BY73Rj5xH0oGiq jHHhK9NRXQnT3dVGeYkW9z0oEJEmti5uKOBBWxHY=
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:44:10 -0700
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK44GCH6OW6LRF4SN7V5TMPQVEVBNHHCWKQC3Q@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4241/c713096347@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4241@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4241@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Pad path validation in both directions (#4241)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f8f3e0aaee13_aa819b4329aa"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/W_2Y_UfvRdi65FVbHKIHKBctKNE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:44:13 -0000

@huitema -- ah, ok, I follow. Yes, this is definitely limited to the scope of problem that we have right now.  As you say, we might need to revisit this if we are to add use cases that we haven't yet considered.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4241#issuecomment-713096347