Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Required state for retaining unacked RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames is unbound (#3509)

martinduke <> Fri, 27 March 2020 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BB83A08A6 for <>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tqn4OXQcJSEx for <>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E3E23A076C for <>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB55C61FF1 for <>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1585321802; bh=O56vWm1KiYhnxkfWTok8iPlYm2kk2Y1FFZsLI43565M=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ps/tbA7EEeM4/54m/k5mQnuse5OmvGkXpgaDWmF8jpkMVFp/OHAQXhoRF7jVEyoYZ HO0X/1NDW2gWCJqQj+/tlZj4YdzCqHhs1dSwxQki+nRXxPsQ5bAKDKB2e9YbdgWP6U 6azGMqX5Y6QE6haWGVxZBl1lkl+cDTNODh9hjiFQ=
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:10:02 -0700
From: martinduke <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3509/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Required state for retaining unacked RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames is unbound (#3509)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e7e174aaeda7_cc13f84912cd9681231b5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:10:06 -0000

@ianswett I would suggest a cumulative RCID as a supplement to the individual RCID. A cumulative one would cleanly handle a lot of cases where there is an unboundedly large list of sequence numbers to retire. If there is a low sequence number that is still in use, the sender can choose to retire it to enable use of the cumulative frame.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: