[quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" intended? (comment 2) (Issue #4968)
Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Fri, 25 March 2022 17:40 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571E03A1745 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LBO7MxdQOnGV for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FBE83A173B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-c5134a3.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-c5134a3.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.23.55]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72206600F4A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1648230027; bh=c9wZ8t1b+ys0gk0iJQBoxhwYh6qxFGj2l7f2AUvcP2w=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=SedbJGQ7wm0lu/ChgyeYAHPpTxnW97e3wE3sf8wOpe2XaT87HpvdDC9AAt2JmzWh+ 6+II9x+k56PXkws2Q/Uq5TR/qLxSIToI73QBXUUXdFKcVxx8jarxDA6Gz+TZ3T/zwb dH743gL4UEBePboB7iZIeVlzJGdqvdAOnGfazlF8=
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:40:27 -0700
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6O4BKWGQXUES42X7WAJMYQXEVBNHHEMZM6EI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4968@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" intended? (comment 2) (Issue #4968)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_623dfe8b64ee9_229ac6fc1296b1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/bccrA1NnYAP3sLy0NOjhMb5ZLm4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 17:40:31 -0000
Is "to the encoder" intended? Should this be "within the encoder" or might "contain" be made "limit" or something else?
Original:
QPACK is designed to contain the more complex state tracking to the
encoder, while the decoder is relatively simple.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4968
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4968@github.com>
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" intended… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Mike Bishop