Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify not arming PTO for ApplicationData before completion (#3486)

ianswett <> Tue, 10 March 2020 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE1C3A083D for <>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.482
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LssldT1iGFsi for <>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DA053A0861 for <>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E60F2C00B3 for <>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1583881628; bh=l+z0mMy3o6Wi/ibOs+pXkfHf9aPdIV8Tbghhzrl+vbE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=aILeDHd91V325f85NUJ4uhDRp6R6AhXuZ1cJ8txBrVFEQijA/kE/jN+PPfOFwwnL3 XtJgnm0L0TkWEkdmIGpPtg1kvFfB83e4X14HIvrhcgsSgVB1LAa5Gtw1QOWL2LQbHH dZQ9XT7LMiVMZKqCythUXlqtEloIPmnL87RkAYI4=
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:07:08 -0700
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3486/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify not arming PTO for ApplicationData before completion (#3486)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e681d9c5e8b5_49f23fde9eccd96017593d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:07:11 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.

> +ApplicationData prevents a client from retransmitting a 0-RTT packet on a PTO
+expiration before confirming that the server is able to decrypt 0-RTT packets,
+and prevents a server from sending a 1-RTT packet on a PTO expiration before it
+has the keys to process an acknowledgement.

This isn't only about the server acknowledging packets, so I think this isn't quite correct.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: