Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can Initial/0-RTT CIDs safely be used for routing? (#2026)

Mike Bishop <> Tue, 20 November 2018 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31801130E61 for <>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:56:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JgFXW_pJAr0D for <>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:56:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9909D130DCC for <>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:56:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:56:35 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1542747395; bh=n0ndqEbB260/9USL9bitmlhoYitqGLYzpIPR8Hfdgr0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=K4VT/mRDn9LPObaklGXdg9WZt3dIu7wAFzKVaSXd9chuo3h6/Nn4PN9vRSlmbeap3 uTucCKKJolppScSRXaIOrMHZ+DJf2tIaYFE5u7Z0/mURfUO8zGS5loPXmVueU7Po5Y 003kTa/g2xLneoawBfBSgscYWiUd/zYWmt55VkYQ=
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2026/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can Initial/0-RTT CIDs safely be used for routing? (#2026)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bf475037f745_4c3d3fe207cd45b4114675"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:56:47 -0000

Conflicting as in, we have text (quoted) which contradicts my understanding of our decision. I think if we decide to go with what we'd discussed before (don't trust the CID of Initial/0-RTT), we should add some Security Considerations text about that.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: