Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can Initial/0-RTT CIDs safely be used for routing? (#2026)

MikkelFJ <> Tue, 20 November 2018 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0BD130E30 for <>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:10:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gyHqomO27gUq for <>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:10:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89DE1130E57 for <>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:10:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:10:49 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1542748249; bh=kq0z64I9XwNRWAabIpOaOex5XK3C7sR2Uukg1/xVBCA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=i6lRV3jPPW6NEDUCqUURreCp0NV1UurGJRrUeITJigzN3N3wdMY+HnQgBsogylAAl cjEkGBShOI8LT9nc0dkB14x9em4PcI6JNm51s3q+929lZ23RbWHl7Mwfv2sT25PFQf +rDN0MUv1mUQopqKJlUSodBfGMuIdZzvslTeB4so=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2026/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can Initial/0-RTT CIDs safely be used for routing? (#2026)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bf478598f0af_7e453fbe7ded45c4223171"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:10:59 -0000

I mean Retry, of course.

You cannot assume IP/port consistency because the routing will in some cases happen behind an external load balancer that exposes a single public IP and routes to a specific internal IP based on CID.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: