Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Single Stream of Bytes for CRYPTO Frames (#1592)

[ekr <[e-mail]>]

I prefer the "starts at zero" structure. I found it much easier to just
have separate flows and then not have to worry about data coming on one
encryption level that had offsets appropriate to another encryption level.

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Nick Banks <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> I know the design team suggested the CRYPTO frame design. I was part of
> the design team. At the time, in the theoretical sense it all made sense.
> After implementing it, I have seen some issues. Also, I agree one
> implementation experience isn't enough to change things outright, but it's
> enough to open an issue and have the discussion.
>
> I'm not arguing to undo everything. I am just trying to consolidate things
> I see as bloated and overly complex. I very much like the design of
> multiple encryption levels. All I am arguing for is a change in how each
> starts its offset.
>
> If folks still generally believe the current way we have offsets is
> better, then so be it. That is not my experience, so that's why I opened
> the issue.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1592#issuecomment-406713278>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABD1ofVNBO5BCXpt1c95QpAKPlm4r5Jqks5uIji8gaJpZM4VYkas>
> .
>


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1592#issuecomment-406798567