Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Relax requirement of detecting duplicate TPs on receiver (#2691)

martinduke <> Tue, 14 May 2019 03:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B961120006 for <>; Mon, 13 May 2019 20:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.464
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-THZrSYjHOV for <>; Mon, 13 May 2019 20:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C94DC12008C for <>; Mon, 13 May 2019 20:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 20:58:09 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1557806289; bh=T0rDoSusD4vSM1YS63eDef5CsuqV26d1xBr0zguvehk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=iDqK97OmCtIILUQpGcnUcxhjrDh/uZgnHCm4ebG7iw9SPHoOn0E1cEOgGlVBRG6rH uyqPNvmWIv/+DM3NQ2CzQ8YBF6Wxtt+9DIk9pjwGtbbI539RjM4jHPgWZJxzRp98Kq dBkc/bvVstIN3NjUa7xv86wHXmudymk9Bhp7bAxI=
From: martinduke <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2691/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Relax requirement of detecting duplicate TPs on receiver (#2691)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cda3cd1396c4_19323fadbbecd96872206e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 03:58:14 -0000

the only thing I don't like about SHOULD validate for supported parameters is that if there are two copies the actual behavior is somewhat ambiguous. If I get two values for the same TP, which should I observe?

Much cleaner to demand enforcement for supported TPs, IMO.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: