Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be dropped more often when the QUIC bit is 0 (#2400)
David Schinazi <notifications@github.com> Tue, 05 February 2019 01:01 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF71F130DEA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 17:01:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NZHJ1VS16xrn for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 17:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 382B2130DD3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 17:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:01:06 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1549328466; bh=Rn8O/18X3i3KPrOg3hw//sWaVaNMSJQhZv80GWlUPZA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=gWxoQu7cDLrOOkG05HzwsNTPWo12hTStFN0NfWtZxLyJFR7uO9JjpKytq81ldITGM /VTqFUYR0kOrzkE9Tz9eTEeyG/lDBj7h18R1N9H/J2qgChLe0SRzoC72XcbK3xfr3c SZBk/FDMJmPIMRn4Bi7Ko61f7FfBCrzPqwIXsgkM=
From: David Schinazi <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab8151fee45df3cc5e96e491c844df771f71f77d9c92cf000000011870a25292a169ce18321f5a@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2400/460474767@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2400@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2400@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be dropped more often when the QUIC bit is 0 (#2400)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c58e0525e829_5d543fc3fb2d45c01130aa"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/sM3ag172jZUDMoqSt_5Xc0pUJRk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 01:01:09 -0000
The reason the second bit was fixed to 1 in QUICv1 was to allow multiplexing with other protocols. Greasing it would defeat that and would cause problems with some Google servers that use it for demultiplexing. Given that these demultiplexing concerns are unlikely to go away, it does make sense to add it to the invariants. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2400#issuecomment-460474767
- [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be dropped mo… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] VN packets may be droppe… Martin Thomson