Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport editorial suggestions (#2731)

ianswett <> Wed, 19 June 2019 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5AA120391 for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.02
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.415, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uHXqQc4Purpx for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EC6B1201F3 for <>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:44:39 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1560905079; bh=4o14VTXu2R7R4L+sVChbrLSwAgoayenyB7U3xMdLVgM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=YradUXWlOHFI8WeKplxCjbB4DsmMfEepqtLM4c4Aad9IIIcjVSZ8mRmmQ4uuln81f MNhC4E4CTpYzWY7kqtYPqPQbr78Fo3NgvmMZPlBtxMhrZz8AwY1YTax9esQDos+/jw g9Oyht8cyUrQiJ61ecyaeDUIttX7fCnqaCr/l3/U=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2731/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport editorial suggestions (#2731)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d0985778ab62_63633fe9580cd95c235417"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:44:43 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.

Thanks, I'm going to remove that paragraph.

> @@ -1336,11 +1335,7 @@ and sets the SCIL field to indicate the length.
 The first flight of 0-RTT packets use the same Destination and Source Connection
 ID values as the client's first Initial.
-The Destination Connection ID field in the server's Initial packet contains a
-connection ID that is chosen by the recipient of the packet (i.e., the client);
-the Source Connection ID includes the connection ID that the sender of the
-packet wishes to use (see {{connection-id}}). The server MUST use consistent
-Source Connection IDs during the handshake.
+The server MUST use consistent Source Connection IDs during the handshake.

Weirdly, this text was already there, see lines 1342/1343.

But I agree, this is clearly incorrect or depends upon the definition of consistent, which I don't believe is worth defining.  I'm going to remove this paragraph.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: