Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disconnect with Initial Injection (#1951)

Kazuho Oku <> Fri, 30 November 2018 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F00A126C01 for <>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:09:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OAObu0TdgSsa for <>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01C21126BED for <>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:09:53 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1543547393; bh=O5DBwayvqfMgd/jcaMqZwj55wUkhxcGkx9jH+UjN1/s=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=vYNLNUz1nCSGPRz/SewZWtbMCvG31f1DDtFFDVlxRlOOUxTgL9QhRrpmK+MGVN1fb 2N20qTAlTucTguMilgxOw/4jGgidEW2vAnl9RfkJ4SAmxUym1E0KWFUon6e7TIyuz8 zDP2sCW+VMu8suQqG1/cH9Ow+vtp7ofqf6deXhNw=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1951/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disconnect with Initial Injection (#1951)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c00aa0130732_5e123f88192d45c0633860"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 03:09:56 -0000

@marten-seemann In this specific case, that is not an issue.

Before the Handshake keys are exchanged, you need to rely on ACKs. At that moment, having rules to reject certain ACKs never hurts.
After the Handshake keys are known, endpoints can ignore ACK frames entirely.

So two-pass is not required if you drop frames at per-frame level.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: