Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-eliciting packet once (#3092)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 22 October 2019 03:02 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB59F120AEC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vOE6oZ_2vC6d for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08E4212000F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:02:41 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1571713361; bh=NPbstdnwI9meCG+daC/4U9hwUOlBO3GwK8mXguCqxP0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=UsMfsRAIK4Yh6HgLWx/YsGxoQuem+/neI1vB6FKNhnZrkF9UJdJlXvtqFk/zer7bE l/55pUIYk9yBRW2Al205z9k15sWnlYXQL/oKLze0eOeKVys1UH1pZds1Hi/WxSYQEO AArd6fkRCO8RHczST9sJjocWnEjIonUG9Sg8VIxQ=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6PEHGISKEVBHYLZ6F3XOY6DEVBNHHB4ODZTE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092/review/304945998@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-eliciting packet once (#3092)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dae71511a3fc_71c53fc3b60cd96088d7"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/zzExs1UAY0WtOZotSl8fqMdqsXU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 03:02:44 -0000
ianswett commented on this pull request. > @@ -3013,18 +3013,21 @@ guidance offered below seeks to strike this balance. An ACK frame SHOULD be generated for at least every second ack-eliciting packet. This recommendation is in keeping with standard practice for TCP {{?RFC5681}}. +Every ack-eliciting packet MUST be acknowledged in at least one transmitted +ACK frame, and SHOULD typically be acknowledged in more than one ACK frame. Sure, that could work. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092#discussion_r337316512
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-eliciting … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-elicit… MikkelFJ