Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-eliciting packet once (#3092)

ianswett <> Tue, 22 October 2019 03:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB59F120AEC for <>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vOE6oZ_2vC6d for <>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08E4212000F for <>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:02:41 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1571713361; bh=NPbstdnwI9meCG+daC/4U9hwUOlBO3GwK8mXguCqxP0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=UsMfsRAIK4Yh6HgLWx/YsGxoQuem+/neI1vB6FKNhnZrkF9UJdJlXvtqFk/zer7bE l/55pUIYk9yBRW2Al205z9k15sWnlYXQL/oKLze0eOeKVys1UH1pZds1Hi/WxSYQEO AArd6fkRCO8RHczST9sJjocWnEjIonUG9Sg8VIxQ=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-eliciting packet once (#3092)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dae71511a3fc_71c53fc3b60cd96088d7"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 03:02:44 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.

> @@ -3013,18 +3013,21 @@ guidance offered below seeks to strike this balance.
 An ACK frame SHOULD be generated for at least every second ack-eliciting packet.
 This recommendation is in keeping with standard practice for TCP {{?RFC5681}}.
+Every ack-eliciting packet MUST be acknowledged in at least one transmitted
+ACK frame, and SHOULD typically be acknowledged in more than one ACK frame.

Sure, that could work.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: