Re: Proposed extension for delayed acknowledgments

Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> Wed, 29 January 2020 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ianswett@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B80120059 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:34:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LTO0u6-e_jHc for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE4D7120045 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:34:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id y11so1295611wrt.6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:34:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dbR39lGpxAzCBE143dMEH0Soys8M8SDyH8nhTYHPcpo=; b=sj/DevTLtz7gN5ARfg6govAisRBeiM2GcEXhlPLUjBRjPx22+hH+HmYShJqBtlGk0/ Nvy+rxRHpLAzXCYtPyQ15HVpjzojKFX94c+ojwTKUIHM+U1YtUgca7CTosbCJ6Xg2LZx 6qyCNBp1oSGoEpwIZPzhtLfQjVtAkxbfXXwQvGST6AyWPzSbEulvfK4Pk3tIZp1sXXPo 71fpA+JvCdxs0adgorc2plEyeAljpS2UfmNwEX8qKuSSMiWfmKFXNAruL5l5/pL/3ZWs uh7YxE3V7n8P+uiLuvADK1CyBk65EAasgQjEZ7i4U5ueaUgHsF/XLWhIu7HPyYwSd8ut M37Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=dbR39lGpxAzCBE143dMEH0Soys8M8SDyH8nhTYHPcpo=; b=HUnTE7N5OQUQ+TFrHGuZv+tIvJAYlJfqREMt4wC4F41QhYEkFt9VwgvzKLqtbnZZ+N 8W9wDQ6EXdOx3zjqnD8PQbHeOgReLjedonYBzAfC3sQ4b6ljaZ2rvg6Y//bYAK9A9qbc wxklTiiQJLKq94MS4ge71lKmXPH1Zq0yQyql7v6/Qm1tDN24QlYehxe6rKgP4qVYUznv kVNZzbqdGgBNWBxYxWHChIxnvshsonc4slkmFN5ZMwI6hGuAbRniBstmikHS5qF0oX82 UL2g3c/Ta8nPbT2JYsFYhUn9DtouLqMEqitFjSSIj7oxovpArAEjpYJ/48PltBA3mFUU 5Hlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV+pfG/u7NPNNzb3jmUFdtg416ey69ZG6KrNm9LxQeiAFff6IRI uncJS8fMX2xcoI2DlwVbGe5xJkhwd1cpK6WyvCKBQg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyPhFVPKhtuotAA9YINT1VtSLHxbZFwTGhd6C5j+PJ8Rpq88MieC28tmvc/AAY1iisKrAlkF6WeioPRSjhoZ5k=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e984:: with SMTP id h4mr897997wrm.275.1580333683867; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:34:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACpbDcdaGPZN1MpxE8GRV64dO8OK64xbCoUvxHPmCoCk9R-MOg@mail.gmail.com> <20200127135053.GB19655@ubuntu-dmitri> <CADdTf+hemtKr5M2MtssvzJn=vLuxxbM+G5i8Jh8XOJ2KV-1oow@mail.gmail.com> <20200127184007.GC19655@ubuntu-dmitri> <CALGR9oY549E-wyv4NMP9TR19cn2u_FCmFNDQZL_fW+0s2Jetrw@mail.gmail.com> <CH2PR22MB2086126A7E195BDD881E37A6DA0B0@CH2PR22MB2086.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <CACpbDcfMGyj5MFzDS9vybv6XQ5+jZ-obvP+DPDX5Y5fmkVd3EQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200129204642.GB18661@ubuntu-dmitri>
In-Reply-To: <20200129204642.GB18661@ubuntu-dmitri>
From: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:34:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKcm_gNPe38iKV5HGjkZCuWUBa6RdhQ=aR6hDZ1yndzFHJUtZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed extension for delayed acknowledgments
To: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Matt Joras <matt.joras@gmail.com>, Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dace0d059d4e1b7f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Dh8BvTUEMEZvTdQnwg1woAtiTsk>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:34:48 -0000

Good point Dmitri, PR(https://github.com/janaiyengar/ack-frequency/pull/21)
created.

I didn't define a codepoint for the reordering field, because I believe it
needs more discussion and isn't critical for initial interop.

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 3:46 PM Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 03:46:16PM -0800, Jana Iyengar wrote:
> > Thanks for proposing the TP: I'll update the draft to use it, knowing
> that
> > we're squatting on it.
>
> And 0xAF (obvious reasons) for the ACK-FREQUENCY frame?
>
>   - Dmitri.
>