IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed extension for delayed acknowledgments

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Tue, 28 January 2020 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2184120024 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:44:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nYCf56Ew3GGn for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:44:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A9F2120020 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:44:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com with SMTP id g15so8921938vsf.1 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:44:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SfQoO11GX8etwZBQm29WaFGNea+2bKkNjtsHXSphqgE=; b=OyqCLda/h6ofXgaag2XxDf1pXMmEwPamkqiMpagHxzH0XpMqXyeihm/muQDFtYCJZs D8oULcXylrGjbyym46YWr7C+/h7xsJmO6lvNN/L7lbIf0e8OqY2dQpMB81WSZtvAKtK+ NVkIXCdeocZsZpkuNAICb0+SjiPRAMt2QfLnnWu95bW3OoP2Gk8yfJr7xtr7kYGbHi5L 24fc4O196i9VGJrqGOfym7h9AJFKAM98+OSzum1xww22jwX0Pyl5h7qm23pWzVMUMePG ZhoIM0y11k1B71HR2ch3zIy1maUQ9iiXCe87XblfMdVMunafF2EB3gzwM+SH0IVygllm nh0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SfQoO11GX8etwZBQm29WaFGNea+2bKkNjtsHXSphqgE=; b=Qxm66DcpeCzMxoNxZdgt+NmjwMM0MKxc/SXgm0GpKmYqXhLyrLNj5geqe1ZpsxG/lK /2lGMLqRjgz9Ed+/IlzfWyZPgr7q/4bZXisvxHhxQvBzmbaI4VnShbzh8OTfV+vF9tT1 Lh1wilBnxhEQA0ZoMtCdAWtYiAJTqeI4omqWHjoInw3EIeZKWE9Iw9zNgb9EMqO6US3j oCa3GC4uVz5EAcMVeJqErncQ7McXf3qEG0LM1WC3Xek0ovqmY/a7IMGccebdrFRDoAor T3c49x9cnqDxi3hcK/bfklfJGRG9urXcqhFfNWRtfnp5nkIMTEVaL+1ThwzdFbFJYs9I jVQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWKvvoOLzL0bMIPl05V9JvOfLIvECD8ZeIh+dnSDyTaOjvzTE5Y G95W0pXbjcEPhCZBLL7Ss+4LZfVmxaCrV1qyAxg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx3YHEImZzIEHxGi/uWzvqvo3HSoe7m3UD+nOFw/YkMYRnXpyfRpTw/7j4KxPnF4DGY8MTzgFJKWQovOuujdp4=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:cf46:: with SMTP id f6mr12088772vsm.143.1580240673359; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:44:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACpbDcdaGPZN1MpxE8GRV64dO8OK64xbCoUvxHPmCoCk9R-MOg@mail.gmail.com> <20200127135053.GB19655@ubuntu-dmitri> <CADdTf+hemtKr5M2MtssvzJn=vLuxxbM+G5i8Jh8XOJ2KV-1oow@mail.gmail.com> <20200127184007.GC19655@ubuntu-dmitri> <CALGR9oY549E-wyv4NMP9TR19cn2u_FCmFNDQZL_fW+0s2Jetrw@mail.gmail.com> <CH2PR22MB2086126A7E195BDD881E37A6DA0B0@CH2PR22MB2086.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <CALGR9oYHZ36AH8NMV7u46DVT3saROg1krCVcWL1TN3oGxazD9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CACpbDcdd+ZWbgoRksAdepW6=3jW5QP3YNniX8RKV-GBX7eV3TQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACpbDcdd+ZWbgoRksAdepW6=3jW5QP3YNniX8RKV-GBX7eV3TQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 19:44:24 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oa8CypP2r5LYsm-ueEVMrKcVgS5r2jOT3huwiLw_EAutQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed extension for delayed acknowledgments
To: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, Matt Joras <matt.joras@gmail.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fecadb059d3873db"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/i1EGIwA_VqwGJaXCgR0gXxsIb14>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 19:44:36 -0000

On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, 19:28 Jana Iyengar, <jri.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

Given the space available, I think informal agreement among implementers
> (as we're doing here and now) is probably adequate. Let's not set another
> system up in preparation for the provisional registry that ought to happen
> Real Soon Now.
>

My observation was that of all the available space, none were selected. It
doesn't seem too onerous a habit for 00 drafts to pick a value and replace
IANA TBD sections with value and status fields. It might be squatting but
in practice aliases with the registration process pretty well.

Lucas

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email