IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed extension for delayed acknowledgments

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Tue, 28 January 2020 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635E512003E for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:19:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Baa05nyson4P for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:19:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x933.google.com (mail-ua1-x933.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::933]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9C98120033 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:19:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x933.google.com with SMTP id h32so5246891uah.4 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:19:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8EUzVbFccpAma5jHtqY8bMmlaozmUGO20RgNRNl63Ss=; b=CVjNsjwwHk4scZdVbDEfCpgF1mWm7aWZKynujsJvUVC/VRZ4T7m3l5tXFXc0c7WTya hSKNUuKnRakLFIRChu5i2HT3K0fHDV/qw1Lz86S/pVgRIsCcj0Eqo5mRKuzj6suhKW02 C3fmOFBx+dZkvnNMYbB1GvCFnXAeE0rzzCyIZsHYG6UofzGHgxOVr9cxp+lTSXZPHJv3 FnLD1sCVEJg859CFx91MXDvYfhUEEcuYKvL3JkPGhANj2lrJB8g1lAveTialD2YrbuPG R+oChuwKS2ujzESWU8KRwe5EL2UWehQFRmDt2GwxO5mghEIj+mYa/zUEi1KtBtJh2pXO s6RA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8EUzVbFccpAma5jHtqY8bMmlaozmUGO20RgNRNl63Ss=; b=o5vIIH9uKFZsYwodKlr0JaB1t1WV1GHdeN2aUEWWR0LEhZZxg4UUlvqk+J8kTz+eF3 9HQZ8/pXW2tpBAsYx/RxtItZFKqshdwoIPijoikqu219mSBHVm5kzMVnW2BEY0U1D1p6 FzgKcfxzo5J5hqjQkyrHhDD9PEt8xR5E5TaJKoQ1F+qFxnV1+IVuJgINdMt+/J7G7uDC n2zADmXag/UujOf3jBMufVf33vjpwURduzRXQ9FsKR5z3qA4TVfzWYq2A7WoBMOBKS8e 9lQCtbwwKjP0FeH3uDfMtY9Ui2VzGXM4iEnR5+I8+RZxQpgBj2LuFego2JgqwsvVMRoD /AHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVwQfO1qmrjfVtU/AgiLkTg2y/xaMzwYJ7kyM44QNpBSue20tS9 TFt69OyweNIaRgv13pS4O6VUU4YDRTei4L55YNM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwblMyZa5W2e86p0f7Q0+I7OSAXfR1G4qTsSvRoUa69C2RUNOiGjtYDAc9sg5nMwuZ4WU4la+NuQRKWKlCiDD8=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:280c:: with SMTP id w12mr13818666uap.79.1580239157904; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:19:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACpbDcdaGPZN1MpxE8GRV64dO8OK64xbCoUvxHPmCoCk9R-MOg@mail.gmail.com> <20200127135053.GB19655@ubuntu-dmitri> <CADdTf+hemtKr5M2MtssvzJn=vLuxxbM+G5i8Jh8XOJ2KV-1oow@mail.gmail.com> <20200127184007.GC19655@ubuntu-dmitri> <CALGR9oY549E-wyv4NMP9TR19cn2u_FCmFNDQZL_fW+0s2Jetrw@mail.gmail.com> <CH2PR22MB2086126A7E195BDD881E37A6DA0B0@CH2PR22MB2086.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CH2PR22MB2086126A7E195BDD881E37A6DA0B0@CH2PR22MB2086.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 19:19:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oYHZ36AH8NMV7u46DVT3saROg1krCVcWL1TN3oGxazD9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed extension for delayed acknowledgments
To: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
Cc: Matt Joras <matt.joras@gmail.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000aacadb059d3819c2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/RjbDshmy1K_6L1Bn6ILuE7M99GM>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 19:19:20 -0000

On Mon, 27 Jan 2020, 21:15 Mike Bishop, <mbishop@evequefou.be> wrote:

> The registry doesn’t exist until the document defining it ships, does it?
> So technically, there’s nothing to make a provisional registration in at
> this point; we’re just picking a value and squatting on it.
>
> Fair point, I agree.

As an individual, I might predict that we'll see a few proposals that need
code points before the registries get set up. I think there is benefit in
(provisional) provisional registration to help set a good example and adopt
the spirit of the guidance.

Lucas

>
>

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email