IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed extension for delayed acknowledgments

Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 28 January 2020 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8AB1200A3 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 13:08:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KSa4cAVqFGnw for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 13:08:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6F68120013 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 13:08:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id h23so16202632ljc.8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 13:08:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UFXMxlmUy37YVkVocPtwtqIwH6fxZ53gsbFoMJHaGaY=; b=MdKv7yLjxtS0ZJ20mV+03unZl7gE9HiWV831n8zyCHDRwX+l59KhV6x07/BxJ2/cAg 3IcbmNDxamrO/3JsNWen1SGl96y4+b0T6KjpbcYcq3T94sTznZ+S13hCrj/dmboNKob7 yZ86XBocv1euGEfZ0KM9n4D69lZV4sfiC6gK/ekkCYMnjtFZjjnLirDH6lbBYlWLncHx hy2ioVpYI5httrq2RenHmu6reAULHS9SzTSPUuJbqWZtVeumLC/mfDVNOZvR6ufxJm31 Y2oI/VMjNCVKwFJMzgLvFTWn7csXYM1+Gpxq0OGukdnmLjgj9QInp7ASrvLDGg5DrST6 qftw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UFXMxlmUy37YVkVocPtwtqIwH6fxZ53gsbFoMJHaGaY=; b=T2DRjn3QiYMr3g3jEVFV4HTVDJmYd/tpFNvuBUYfLOWdm99ywVMoXY5CLRAFnEjYPQ C+IFJSH5ekuDM5mTRA+CQ62nrEelREcxFepayv1Qfq0zeqYkiwv88XSG8u5wIi7AmaJL R4S3KgNRrd9RrqEQDvpu8FZfl3LOsDNXp8MaKSEMU0DXig9X5Lbe+YSEOz7ZenuV34U3 o1aesy7hcPYkqxgexJ4uVsEWGUpg1w7g4ZSrWajvMN91PPOzKvaq99aJThpj1TywQAMW M09hjfVVlkS6oyZxapubIr2jHIPKeGD7meBtpbnolz8MJN6QwbvVXqoYP92R4p6XJ4eG HwEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVZ0ZlAjOHphl6z7sDsMeLeP5oLKygJxQ/SFPEEpkR56GbPUNfG q9te1cLADPczrw+h+aYwKYaHK6JWLqeVREDDzLM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx1vALgyLk7tQoCK4Qu0PFY/+NGjdF5E1KCdYsAFvhjNh5H/+kMISna+xMudQ549vui48du+6LrXWbaxTBu0Uk=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9e85:: with SMTP id f5mr15622704ljk.132.1580245696794; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 13:08:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACpbDcdaGPZN1MpxE8GRV64dO8OK64xbCoUvxHPmCoCk9R-MOg@mail.gmail.com> <20200127135053.GB19655@ubuntu-dmitri> <CADdTf+hemtKr5M2MtssvzJn=vLuxxbM+G5i8Jh8XOJ2KV-1oow@mail.gmail.com> <20200127184007.GC19655@ubuntu-dmitri> <CALGR9oY549E-wyv4NMP9TR19cn2u_FCmFNDQZL_fW+0s2Jetrw@mail.gmail.com> <CH2PR22MB2086126A7E195BDD881E37A6DA0B0@CH2PR22MB2086.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <CALGR9oYHZ36AH8NMV7u46DVT3saROg1krCVcWL1TN3oGxazD9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CACpbDcdd+ZWbgoRksAdepW6=3jW5QP3YNniX8RKV-GBX7eV3TQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oa8CypP2r5LYsm-ueEVMrKcVgS5r2jOT3huwiLw_EAutQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oa8CypP2r5LYsm-ueEVMrKcVgS5r2jOT3huwiLw_EAutQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 13:08:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CACpbDceZ21KvHwYzE5XUZSwyAMUoa=L6a8O01P6jKw1Q==8Lqw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed extension for delayed acknowledgments
To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, Matt Joras <matt.joras@gmail.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006a5538059d399fc6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/-PUMJlvRkTTjRNwAs5Qt_bem5Tw>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 21:08:20 -0000

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:44 AM Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, 19:28 Jana Iyengar, <jri.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Given the space available, I think informal agreement among implementers
>> (as we're doing here and now) is probably adequate. Let's not set another
>> system up in preparation for the provisional registry that ought to happen
>> Real Soon Now.
>>
>
> My observation was that of all the available space, none were selected. It
> doesn't seem too onerous a habit for 00 drafts to pick a value and replace
> IANA TBD sections with value and status fields. It might be squatting but
> in practice aliases with the registration process pretty well.
>

Fair enough, and I agree.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email