Re: draft-ietf-quic-http-29, "1.1. Prior versions of HTTP"

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 19 June 2020 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4818C3A10A4 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jwqWfjSN4VLF for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7755E3A10A3 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1592535838; bh=OETNzYJs9Ku9LdWJaCzMPQyUChUXwe252kS6gSp5fAA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=gswtChiVLy2Lz5vdoppBxVWKEe6oklenjSfCf4EZd6A3LQ9XUErok5sEDc0Uqq+N2 QVwv/eB7MMXQ8oWGugoTn7+hwZU5qiaRNiw+Lv8wfdOST1uOXhPAn57cQuX2rByXcm eLVXZte2i1soCtmZFd0M7ZHwVNx8JaAXhNQMW+7Y=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.182] ([91.61.49.120]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MWics-1jNxhO28pE-00X4q0; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 05:03:58 +0200
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-quic-http-29, "1.1. Prior versions of HTTP"
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: quic@ietf.org
References: <8c747b59-1672-4ccb-dfce-0914e74c504f@gmx.de> <9B975808-6BF3-491C-8E32-C475824B0E9A@mnot.net>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <1b124954-2804-a64c-e567-0bbf0ae15ed5@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 05:03:57 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9B975808-6BF3-491C-8E32-C475824B0E9A@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:o0QYTXCGbVsvStm1y0oeEVUgLy42Dw3i/rY7eLrP3RYliR3GiSq Cb2umU5QtObrc+yV6Ye5U//TVeO+tc0W4E9qcn4WZ4EW8ctOXUngM5xX5TqQuUaVrBqjBy8 gvdT5TF153QTiEumSp/hO4qdvMICHBBbR4ppI0PHVvb4sy79UaC4KrKI4OvpH6+G+pwE7xP eNaQ9EiWYVWLNJzG5jvUQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:SN1dVQExIOs=:zWTHcqGSbyD6CsDI6HObSg UoreEQbzempc1mHP4GmaMXgFoG3PDdItKv4OX2S50Q0bZv8sUmiIFavg1m3BLaL1wSGrFleLJ cpeG2zfE1ndavXrT1vgtdZea1Bgh4g7Pj/PL8jCjElGpKMMwGa16uC4yXYyWOYeTHHrPPCIo8 y/2rfxroR4QX86oSBIFiPNTNzzAQVU/4nx3K9Ghi+7/a94tiqcsDfRK4jS4Xk1Q2FcvNlT+/K rL137k6ENRv/Db4Z+8PK5HJ9nPVp+GOgr2oL1YFuHE6jU4OAQnkYtpT34blOskZa2KjxM8lof U7oH1GLqIaCBRSthZXCqwQFW/xrlq2evLn6i1eQ6r+7C3fvY6R7Sqn4vh6nkPjHn6PUEhg6pJ VqrzwupplOfti/dqB0UfUUubizyn4bMMF02iLI9RF24nKrelw9bSp7s7x3C+8j/0bB20VJ6Un NMLy4HmXDYQZxas88fKtJ80w2EO+pDZk3TKjGusxnmlGyGzxICbddEw5muU3FSygzRZvLn3Uh K7JqMvJWXD1MQEceEy8HqzkpThFro6X8R/OmYnnT7r5KxoNHcXH32zacIibdlGeCLPaNBzTog vvnPwH27T62nMmLZXa9HmISFLcVwUK1lfudWxEbMZL+TW08sOXAjFH7XBaXFIoT2l8Fj/5pke geN1XWuEYSidOmG2sY+BsodKc7bZUa5o9SFn4GpzN23dWJHBAxsBCKAUwzm++q/l1L0TycWuy Br/uXdwPNZC67/CRcRjiJJi89O7UJ3fr7XZLnxO97rArVg89LcDH/xBZDnjNkh9erEMWhabMl eO92s7oYchT25zNOkZmb4IuT3PgDUsqEQtMB8hW4JuRzdphQy4dA3O99W1Qzf8hFhAtGg2yCQ BAFO83yHE/l5mI717CECrTJqxPSM2tTi7WfLMliMtapZBE8c2A/8zpc2m0VKt0cOk7wc/0jF9 xfVP+Zk/KG7K/BvFKaGC/j3ngDJBhjqIHuP6iz5awp5wbovVk5a15sfiYCt4/Iw6IKco/Rqz2 CqutTHxJbIIY1GUq2dCG4fZKWOPmB6okTwIuirdcERukGEDpmNr9nlDzKcyRvIIOjtFO1LeBG f/BNhKXbPO4RfIPXtUrmbcMZMGI2Xewuf+Om4kZ8Htq0x+Nxx2bI28kImwQ5jNjeo6em/8o3b /W8e8w66Ge3t6zoY9/eHJMWFn2XAV9Jj7TitQ5Lr0h2k5ktv7Fi0mxzlYJq5wMq3iEQFzSXOb HHEbQP0Txb/Kzv8Os
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/FAgMSSHVjJuD8EDfXoE8b5wJb4A>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 03:04:07 -0000

On 19.06.2020 01:19, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> My .02 -
>
> I think we need to balance between being correct and over-complicating the text here. In *theory*, Julian is correct; in wide practice, pipelining isn't used because of the limitations it has, as well as implementation / interop issues.
>
> How about something like:
>
> "Because of limitations in how HTTP exchanges are mapped onto TCP connections in HTTP/1.1, multiple parallel connections are often used..."
>
> ?
>
> Cheers,

SGTM.