IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: AD review: draft-ietf-quic-datagram-06

Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Wed, 08 December 2021 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <tpauly@apple.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775063A08AD; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:09:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.701, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uy4FvuFgGA3u; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:09:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp24.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp24.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82FD83A08B4; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:08:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp24.rno.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp24.rno.apple.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1B8I3mWR023543; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:08:44 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=from : message-id : content-type : mime-version : subject : date : in-reply-to : cc : to : references; s=20180706; bh=pmcamRqz+zjMZzgDfKZ77Z+Lbyd4iX3aAvzXvvkFQDE=; b=iODv88YCi69Vwv/kqTbop+RNIPF/jiYR793euAkeIWbi0L9xUrgYzRsOLdPKaq9OtG4Z 5AFcfhqUuhxYREcqnskq/ttEg+IXawyXjDXjqiAi3JxODjqr7MTxoM52ph/jcKPsVaBd /i421J+xnOClaHm4NFWKkAVtYSl6BaJCFXURwlvsYdeFfA0533IF+7lOkSOj/RNj//kP ByKX/foTwFp9+icDbt7/Z9Bw0KVcUtPkqREJU8h5zbLX0UqA3cs66NWiojWWcEK6Vh8+ gDP3SVLDg4EEOxyHJf+i7gwI7rlInz4sXj2zsETJaDYluzUygw3ETZPfFqz0l1NN/8VN Mw==
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp04.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp04.rno.apple.com [10.225.203.152]) by rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp24.rno.apple.com with ESMTP id 3crry89vge-2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 08 Dec 2021 10:08:44 -0800
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.15]) by rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp04.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.12.20210903 64bit (built Sep 3 2021)) with ESMTPS id <0R3T00BAJ6EKGDK0@rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp04.rno.apple.com>; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 10:08:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.12.20210903 64bit (built Sep 3 2021)) id <0R3T00O005UKGE00@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com>; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 10:08:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: 9da32e1d4d62bbc5b549aff1ee920799
X-Va-E-CD: 7c9c56bd4496d9cac81ac5795d49b6b5
X-Va-R-CD: d3b2509ebe6029f047d3265fca803981
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: c866e15f-0bcc-4ce0-9567-fc28b1c7cb25
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: 9da32e1d4d62bbc5b549aff1ee920799
X-V-E-CD: 7c9c56bd4496d9cac81ac5795d49b6b5
X-V-R-CD: d3b2509ebe6029f047d3265fca803981
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: f931a991-abca-43d8-bcd3-77abcb2bbbfe
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-12-08_04:2021-12-08, 2021-12-08 signatures=0
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [17.11.100.59]) by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.12.20210903 64bit (built Sep 3 2021)) with ESMTPSA id <0R3T00AA26EJJG00@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com>; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 10:08:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Message-id: <DE0BCC43-4553-48FA-A810-92148BDB1D3A@apple.com>
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8F498557-4D78-46F0-9021-DEA3E4A71C87"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3691.0.3\))
Subject: Re: AD review: draft-ietf-quic-datagram-06
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 10:08:42 -0800
In-reply-to: <AM0PR07MB4178D17806895519DE54F6A59F6E9@AM0PR07MB4178.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-quic-datagram.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-quic-datagram.authors@ietf.org>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <8F8BF695-5B27-44F4-AC26-9D50BD398F79@ericsson.com> <C5E09C14-4FC4-4E00-AB90-C1D0C1355B17@apple.com> <CALGR9oZvFQUcZPk-LHeELFvUYJAUPQHR2SFGAxbGwcXaC3UR4g@mail.gmail.com> <EC056A93-1D54-48D9-BEFB-EC8ED8C7853A@apple.com> <AM0PR07MB4178D17806895519DE54F6A59F6E9@AM0PR07MB4178.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3691.0.3)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-12-08_04:2021-12-08, 2021-12-08 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/nHCmijtmMSetLvT-jb6_VbGuC1U>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 18:09:17 -0000

Hi Zahed,

Thanks again for your comments and review! We’ve posted an -07 that resolves the issues as discussed in GitHub.

Best,
Tommy

> On Dec 6, 2021, at 8:56 PM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Super. Thanks Tommy.
> 
> BR
> Zahed 
> From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 11:56:24 PM
> To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>; Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>
> Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; draft-ietf-quic-datagram.authors@ietf.org <draft-ietf-quic-datagram.authors@ietf.org>; IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: AD review: draft-ietf-quic-datagram-06
>  
> I’ve switched this to the standard "Discussion Venues” section that gets automatically added. (See editor’s copy, https://quicwg.org/datagram/draft-ietf-quic-datagram.html <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-fe22d327-454445555731-0672ce34b2c3ae78&q=1&e=0-4172d1abbc906e09a488aa032af37594&u=https%3A%2F%2Fquicwg.org%2Fdatagram%2Fdraft-ietf-quic-datagram.html>).
> 
> Thanks,
> Tommy
> 
>> On Dec 6, 2021, at 11:04 AM, Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com <mailto:lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for the review Zahed
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 6:17 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>> Hi Zahed,
>> 
>> Thanks for the review!
>> 
>>> On Dec 6, 2021, at 5:53 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com <mailto:zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi, 
>>>  
>>> Thanks for well written and short document.
>>>  
>>> This document have following text in the abstract and introduction –
>>>  
>>> “Discussion of this work is encouraged to happen on the QUIC IETF mailing list quic@ietf.org <mailto:quic@ietf.org> or on the GitHub repository which contains the draft: https://github.com/quicwg/datagram <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-fe22d327-454445555731-d8c57b11f2359f3e&q=1&e=0-4172d1abbc906e09a488aa032af37594&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fquicwg%2Fdatagram>.”
>>>  
>>> I don’t think we need to have them at this stage of this document. Please remove them.
>> 
>> Looking at RFC9000, this was around even in the last version prior to RFC publication (draft-ietf-quic-transport-34). I don’t think it’s beneficial to remove this now.
>> 
>> +1, As a compromise, perhaps add an RFC editor note to remove the note before publication? 
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Lucas
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email