IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Draft response to Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 Requirements to IETF QUIC Working Group"

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 30 September 2020 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B3E3A1315 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 01:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A5sgNXFodoPB for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 01:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE403A1314 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 01:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:64e8:8d4c:6d6a:9695] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:64e8:8d4c:6d6a:9695]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32B43618711; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:48:21 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1601455701; bh=L5+sECacYcRug59kZg0+Srxc12FZMDgIbQwFqAgAeU8=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=f6HcCw9I/Vs+kxiVlA0e8DpvTUxtyD2Fxbmr+g16Ac81aCxKPb92yGz7/OcQUT3IJ zs+DvPNsJlVh/2HYip/f9yn0gS7uzR3rf8L5tfJCIVK1W5Rpa4lLRbiyQ4mS5LBdhS qogC7g64Vbpqa3e8RwGLNW2VzdWjI+EsYRT5ZsjM=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <1FB14989-1C93-422D-9CD5-8382809B5AE8@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AF109B3E-CB5B-401C-A958-5C882F15348D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Subject: Re: Draft response to Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 Requirements to IETF QUIC Working Group"
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:48:20 +0300
In-Reply-To: <b87f4692ecdf397db0a25f2996063a8b5f332d2e.camel@ericsson.com>
Cc: "quic@ietf.org" <quic@ietf.org>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
References: <5530E619-F6A8-4ECA-A9E9-3DE4B5DECA97@eggert.org> <b87f4692ecdf397db0a25f2996063a8b5f332d2e.camel@ericsson.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 32B43618711.AE0C2
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/ziB9HTQUNBmTupVDPHVutSloCaE>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:48:36 -0000

Hi,

On 2020-9-30, at 11:41, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
> So I think your comment about discussion of abandoning Multi-path may have come
> as a surprise to some people. Where has that discussion occurred?

it was in the context of the rechartering discussion last December. Matt linked to this message from Jana (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/R-uJhzzXBz-93OTmYupXu8ooJdA/) which seems to summarize the standpoint of the group that is questioning support for multipath in QUIC. I think there were other related messages in that thread.

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email