IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Update RFC 6929 in draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Thu, 20 March 2014 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17CB1A0751 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id moOrUcoK16zG for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from power.freeradius.org (power.freeradius.org [88.190.25.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90ACD1A03FE for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105E52240749; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:51:47 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at power.freeradius.org
Received: from power.freeradius.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (power.freeradius.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tc44DCKk27hD; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:51:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Thor.local (bas1-ottawa11-1176224686.dsl.bell.ca [70.27.195.174]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8043A2240133; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:51:46 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <532B0083.7050606@deployingradius.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:51:47 -0400
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <53285DE2.9040802@cisco.com> <035801cf42d2$99464b80$cbd2e280$@augustcellars.com> <5328C172.5080305@deployingradius.com> <14050.1395325355@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <14050.1395325355@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/G6u-wco5Wlf5MM8aK6DkTYKzSKk
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] Update RFC 6929 in draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:52:29 -0000

Michael Richardson wrote:
> It's not just the document/WG, it is also users of the protocol who think
> that they are in a walled garden, and can abuse reserved fields.

  I have zero sympathy for such people.

> The WG will be shutdown at some point,

  Never!

> An Experimental document can allocate bits from a standard... on an
> experimental basis.  ECN bits were done that way.

  OK.

  I'm not sure we want an IANA registry for these bits.  It seems
overkill.  But it would be a way to track their allocation.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email