IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] RADIUS/(D)TLS port usage (was: Review of draft-ietf-radext-radiusdtls)

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 09 April 2024 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E009C14F6A0 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 05:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R3RX1QTcQki5 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 05:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6234BC14F68C for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 05:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (135-23-95-173.cpe.pppoe.ca [135.23.95.173]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4903A8D; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:47:24 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <2e70196c-0def-401f-83ed-0eb924cc60eb@dfn.de>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 08:47:22 -0400
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <78CCE616-3581-48F2-A2D7-909953F3DA00@deployingradius.com>
References: <CA9BEA9C-39EF-4764-A0FE-D122413B37F7@deployingradius.com> <18ef8267-474e-49ae-9204-0c6c79d5e50c@dfn.de> <2e70196c-0def-401f-83ed-0eb924cc60eb@dfn.de>
To: Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieckers@dfn.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/bGGOnBd9nO7bQG0h3yC50bZcwZ8>
Subject: Re: [radext] RADIUS/(D)TLS port usage (was: Review of draft-ietf-radext-radiusdtls)
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 12:47:30 -0000

On Apr 9, 2024, at 6:17 AM, Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieckers@dfn.de> wrote:
> My suggestion is to generally forbid using the RADIUS/UDP and RADIUS/TCP ports for RADIUS/(D)TLS, to make it absolutely clear that this is completely different.

  I agree.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email